-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add cake-contrib user #1
Comments
@gep13 I have not seen this. I'll take a look today. Thanks! |
@nlowe perfect. Please let me know if you have any questions. |
@gep13 Thanks again for opening this issue. From what I understand the procedure outlined in the blog post you linked has two purposes:
Do I have that right? A few thoughts. On the first point, even though that blog post has been around since late 2016, I was unaware the As for adding the |
@nlowe thanks for getting back to me. I wanted to try to address a couple points, in order to make sure that we are on the same page...
Yes, this is certainly the intention. What I meant by this, is that in addition to looking at the list of addins which are present on the Cake website, people can all look at this list on NuGet.org: https://www.nuget.org/profiles/cake-contrib To get a list of the addins that exist for Cake.
Yes, this is what I would regard as the primary reason behind what I am describing. Let me give you an example... One of our Cake Contributors created this package, and pushed it to NuGet.org: https://www.nuget.org/packages/Cake.MSBuildTask/ The cake-contrib user was not a co-maintainer of the package on NuGet.org at the time. Now, fast-forward a couple of years, and unfortunately, the maintainer of that package sadly died. Another member of the Cake Community reached out to us because they were hoping to get the addin updated. Since we didn't have access to the NuGet Package, we had two options...
We went with the latter and we were fortunate in the fact that the NuGet Team didn't have a precedence for this happening, and as a result, they made the cake-contrib user a co-maintainer of the package. Going forward, this won't happen as there are now rules in place for dealing with these situations, which include contacting the next of kin of a package, or having written agreements in place, etc. This is far from ideal, but I totally understand where the NuGet Team are coming from. As it is now though, we (the Cake Team) are able to push new package versions to this package, and we have forked the original repository in the cake-contrib organisation on GitHub in order to continue development. In order to avoid this situation happening again, whilst still allowing Cake Community members to be the primary maintainer of the package, we pre-emptively ask maintainers to add the cake-contrib user as a co-maintainer for their packages. This is on the understanding that we, the Cake Team, would never push a package version, unless explicitly told to by the maintainer. This approach means that we have a route that we can take to continue development, should the worst happen.
Notice, in all of the above situation that I described, I didn't mention moving the GitHub Repository into the cake-contrib organisation, and I did this quite specifically. This is certainly far from mandatory, and adding the cake-contribu user to the NuGet package, is not the same thing as moving it into the cake-contrib organisation, and the two things don't have to happen at the same time, or even at all. I would regard the movement in the cake-contrib organisation as a "nice to have", and the addition of the cake-contrib user on NuGet as a strong preference. What I will say is that if you did choose to move the repository under the cake-contrib organisation, you would have FULL control over the development of the addin. We, the Cake Team, would not get involved at all, unless the maintainer requested some help.
I am hoping that based on the description of the real problem that we faced, you can see why this can be quite an important thing. Please let me know if you have any questions about this. I would be happy to jump on a call to discuss further if you wanted to. |
After consideration I've decided to add the
I understand and I appreciate the nuance. Perhaps I wasn't as clear as I thought: I understand that moving the project to the Thanks again for the heads up, let me know if there's anything else I need to fix on the nuget.org side of things. |
Totally understand. Feel free to reach out if/when you want to get it transferred. Thank you for adding the cake-contrib user on NuGet.org. I have accepted the request. |
First of all, I wanted to thank you for adding to the Cake community by adding this addin.
I was just wondering if you had seen this blog post:
http://cakebuild.net/blog/2016/08/cake-contribution-organization
We are currently going through a process of increasing the visibility of addins, and also trying to ensure their long term maintainability.
To that end, we are asking addin creators to add the cake-contrib user on NuGet as a co-owner (this can be done through the NuGet website by clicking on Manage Owners on the package page).
Would you be interested in doing this? If you have any questions about this, please let me know. There was some initial concern that the Cake Team were trying to "take over" packages, and that couldn't be further from the truth, and if you have this concern, or others, I would like to address them.
Thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: