No License Specified

[joelthe1]

Based on what the paper said, I understand that this code is meant for enabling others to use/extend further. I could not, however, find a license specified to the code-base which precludes others from using it legally as stated by GitHub in this section:

You're under no obligation to choose a license. However, without a license, the default copyright laws apply, 
meaning that you retain all rights to your source code and no one may reproduce, distribute, or 
create derivative works from your work.

I request that an open-source license be applied.

[noa]

@joelthe1 Thanks for the question. The individual source files were marked Apache 2.0 but we neglected to add a corresponding Apache 2.0 LICENSE file to the repo. I've just added one now.

I'll close the issue be feel free to re-open if you have further questions about the license.