-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 40
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
de novo sequencing without evaluation #10
Comments
Hi Ben,
Let me know if you have other questions, feel free to close the issue otherwise. |
Greeting @melihyilmaz, This is actually a really amazing tool! I have successfully started the program. Now it is running. Based on the output file you had provided can I request for a program improvement feature? The improvement I would suggest is to allow a proteomics fasta database to be provided in the command itself. Subsequently, the program would match the denovo sequenced peptides onto the fasta protein database provided and append the fasta header to the corresponding peptides. Based on this it would be easier to know from which protein these peptides are derived from. Also if the denovo sequenced peptide is absent from the provided protein database, it should be labeled as missing. I understand this is a huge ask, but this enhancement would improve downstream analysis. Additionally, I also observed the user warning of: rank_zero_warn("You are running on single node with no parallelization, so distributed has no effect.")
Regards, |
Hi @BenSamy2020, I've been using the program recently and think I can help!
Hope this helps! |
Greetings @guhanrv, I am really appreciative of your assistances. With regards to CPUs I will edit line 30 of config.py file. Once again thank alot! Regards, |
Greetings,
Firstly, I would like to thank you for providing this open source tool. I am currently interested to perform de novo sequencing without evaluation. Based on your github page, it was shown to run the command of:
casanovo --mode=denovo --model_path='path/to/pretrained' --test_data_path='path/to/test' --config_path='path/to/config' --output_path='path/to/output'
Regards,
Ben
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: