-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 29.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Proposal: Split TSC agenda in to two meetings #1879
Comments
Speaking for myself, it's already difficult enough to slot in one weekly meeting, let alone two. -1 from me. |
There was tentative agreement in today's TSC meeting and @mikeal is going to work out a proposal. Removing the tsc-agenda label. |
Hmmm, re-reading I think this could work. According to the proposal above, @bnoordhuis there's no reason you'd need to attend both most of the time I think. |
I hope so but it hinges on how the agenda is sliced. Let's see how it works out. |
Any progress on this? Should I tag it tsc-agenda? |
See nodejs/TSC#2, this has been completed. |
As it stands, the TSC has two primary roles:
We've done a pretty consistent job of 1 but I don't feel like we're doing enough for 2. For instance, we've never taken on an agenda item for more than simply approving a working group and we have no clear mechanism for working groups to add new agenda items to the meetings.
We're also overdue for placing several Working Group representatives on the TSC (per the new Project Life-cycle several working groups are "Core" which means they are entitled to a TSC rep).
So, here's my proposal.
As you can imagine, the first meeting solidifies the "core sync up" that happens in the current meeting while the second meeting provides a similar function for the working groups to more accurately sync up and consider other project wide issues.
This should be considered and experiment. If we feel it is deficient we can go back to the old process. If it's successful we may want to consider splitting these responsibilities more formally.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: