Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on May 18, 2021. It is now read-only.

Proposal: rename the nodejs/iojs-tw WG to nodejs/nodejs-zh-TW #138

Closed
srl295 opened this issue Oct 7, 2015 · 16 comments
Closed

Proposal: rename the nodejs/iojs-tw WG to nodejs/nodejs-zh-TW #138

srl295 opened this issue Oct 7, 2015 · 16 comments

Comments

@srl295
Copy link
Member

srl295 commented Oct 7, 2015

Dear members of the io.js Chinese (Taiwan) WG iojs-tw

It is proposed to rename this repo to:

nodejs/nodejs-zh-TW

As part of the io.js and node.js convergence, node.js releases are now based on the codebase and user base of the converged node.js and io.js communities. A number of the resources and repositories have already been renamed.
In the absence of objections or other discussion, this rename will occur on or after Oct 28, 2015

However, active language working groups should take ownership of this issue and discuss/dispose of it according to their own processes.

For more information or to discuss the overall issue, please see and comment on nodejs/node#2525

This statement was authorized by the Node.js TSC

Cc: @nodejs/iojs-tw

@srl295
Copy link
Member Author

srl295 commented Oct 7, 2015

Please note as with nodejs/nodejs-zh-CN#173 my proposal includes language and region in your WG's new name. There were only two groups that used a region name as group name, all others were strictly language.

@PeterDaveHello
Copy link
Member

👍

1 similar comment
@jihchi
Copy link
Contributor

jihchi commented Oct 8, 2015

👍

@appleboy
Copy link
Contributor

appleboy commented Oct 8, 2015

👍 Agree ..

@jessy1092
Copy link
Contributor

👍 Nice

@jostw
Copy link

jostw commented Oct 8, 2015

👍

4 similar comments
@chentsulin
Copy link
Contributor

👍

@imZack
Copy link

imZack commented Oct 8, 2015

👍

@zack9433
Copy link

zack9433 commented Oct 8, 2015

👍

@Rukeith
Copy link

Rukeith commented Oct 8, 2015

👍

@srl295
Copy link
Member Author

srl295 commented Oct 8, 2015

Please see the discussion in iojs-CN in the issue I linked to. Should this
group be zh-TW or really zh-Hant (traditional orthography regardless of
location)?

El jueves, 8 de octubre de 2015, Rukeith notifications@github.com
escribió:

+1


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#138 (comment).

@jessy1092
Copy link
Contributor

@srl295 The original WG purpose is for localizations team. I prefer zh-TW. :)

@clonn
Copy link
Contributor

clonn commented Oct 9, 2015

👍

@siygle
Copy link
Contributor

siygle commented Oct 9, 2015

+1 zh-TW

@appleboy
Copy link
Contributor

@srl295 Done

@srl295
Copy link
Member Author

srl295 commented Nov 2, 2015

@appleboy Thanks

@srl295 srl295 closed this as completed Nov 2, 2015
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests