Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Documentation Question on Soiling #35

Closed
kurt-rhee opened this issue Jun 2, 2020 · 5 comments
Closed

Documentation Question on Soiling #35

kurt-rhee opened this issue Jun 2, 2020 · 5 comments

Comments

@kurt-rhee
Copy link

image

Hello what is the timestep of this soiling sequence, is it monthly?

@cpaulgilman
Copy link
Collaborator

Yes, the soiling loss input is an array of 12 percentage values, one for each month of the year. During a simulation, the beam irradiance for each time step in a month is multiplied by the soiling loss for that month.

@kurt-rhee
Copy link
Author

Thank you for the information!

@kurt-rhee
Copy link
Author

I have another theoretical question, how does PVwatts v7 calculate bifacial gain if I don't specify albedo in model.SolarResource?

I see that changing bifaciality changes my energy value.

Thanks,

Kurt

@cpaulgilman
Copy link
Collaborator

cpaulgilman commented Jun 3, 2020

Hi Kurt,

If you do not provide albedo data in the weather file, pvwattsv7 (and pvsamv1 and earlier versions of pvwatts) use a default value of 0.2 for all time steps. You can see that in the pvwattsv7 source code around Line 735:

https://github.com/NREL/ssc/blob/develop/ssc/cmod_pvwattsv7.cpp

Thanks,
Paul.

@kurt-rhee
Copy link
Author

Very helpful, thank you Paul

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants