You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Sep 1, 2023. It is now read-only.
Doesn't boosting affect affinity for all previously seen patterns that are just beneath the connected threshold - globally without regard for; or biasing toward any particular pattern? Just wondering how the could act as an attention "focusing" mechanism?
Doesn't boosting affect affinity for all previously seen patterns that
are just beneath the connected threshold - globally without regard for; or
biasing toward any particular pattern? Just wondering how the could act as
an attention "focusing" mechanism?
Yes, that is boosting as the mechanism, but I've meant to boost (like a
word) the synaptic input (or maybe slightly increase sensitivity even
globally) for situations when "something unexpected happens". That leads to
auto focus on "wrong" details, or higher sensitivity in risky situations.
(or at least I believe so)
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Interesting thought of HTM, where SP's active columns get
boosted
fromanomalous
input, therefore creating a "short-term attention memory"@subutai @cogmission
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: