You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Sep 1, 2023. It is now read-only.
I'm currently experimenting with multiencoders, would it be useful to add a padding(=0) pattern which separates outputs of various sub-encoders in the final array?
motivation is that the edges of neighboring encoders would make connected segment's synapses confused (the stable separation pattern should suppress that).
If you find it useful, can someone hack it up please? Im a bit lost in the MultiEnc code..
Thanks, breznak
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
This would only have an impact if you are using topology, which we generally don't do with MultiEncoder. I'm not sure there is much of a use case for it.
I'm currently experimenting with multiencoders, would it be useful to add a padding(=0) pattern which separates outputs of various sub-encoders in the final array?
Example:
MultiEncoder.__init__(self, encoderDescriptions=None, padding=0)
Now: {EncoderOutput1 | EncoderOutput2 | ...}
After (padding=3): {EncoderOutput1 | 000 | EncoderOutput2 | 000 |...}
motivation is that the edges of neighboring encoders would make connected segment's synapses confused (the stable separation pattern should suppress that).
If you find it useful, can someone hack it up please? Im a bit lost in the MultiEnc code..
Thanks, breznak
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: