REFACTOR: move the 0% commands to nu-cmd-extra

[amtoine]

requires

• move common tools from nu-command to nu-cmd-base #9455

⚙️ Description

in this PR i move the commands we've all agreed, in the core team, to move out of the core Nushell to the extra feature.

Warning
in the first commits here, i've

• moved the implementations to nu-cmd-extra
• removed the declaration of all the commands below from nu-command
• made sure the commands were not available anymore with cargo run -- -n

the list of commands to move

with the current command table downloaded as commands.csv, i've run

let commands = (
    open commands.csv
    | where is_plugin == "FALSE" and category != "deprecated"
    | select name category "approv. %"
    | rename name category approval
    | insert treated {|it| (
        ($it.approval == 100) or                # all the core team agreed on them
        ($it.name | str starts-with "bits") or  # see https://github.com/nushell/nushell/pull/9241
        ($it.name | str starts-with "dfr")      # see https://github.com/nushell/nushell/pull/9327
    )}
)

to preprocess them and then

$commands | where {|it| (not $it.treated) and ($it.approval == 0)}

to get all untreated commands with no approval, which gives

╭────┬───────────────┬─────────┬─────────────┬──────────╮
│  # │     name      │ treated │  category   │ approval │
├────┼───────────────┼─────────┼─────────────┼──────────┤
│  0 │ fmt           │ false   │ conversions │        0 │
│  1 │ each while    │ false   │ filters     │        0 │
│  2 │ roll          │ false   │ filters     │        0 │
│  3 │ roll down     │ false   │ filters     │        0 │
│  4 │ roll left     │ false   │ filters     │        0 │
│  5 │ roll right    │ false   │ filters     │        0 │
│  6 │ roll up       │ false   │ filters     │        0 │
│  7 │ rotate        │ false   │ filters     │        0 │
│  8 │ update cells  │ false   │ filters     │        0 │
│  9 │ decode hex    │ false   │ formats     │        0 │
│ 10 │ encode hex    │ false   │ formats     │        0 │
│ 11 │ from url      │ false   │ formats     │        0 │
│ 12 │ to html       │ false   │ formats     │        0 │
│ 13 │ ansi gradient │ false   │ platform    │        0 │
│ 14 │ ansi link     │ false   │ platform    │        0 │
│ 15 │ format        │ false   │ strings     │        0 │
╰────┴───────────────┴─────────┴─────────────┴──────────╯

🖌️ User-Facing Changes

$nothing

🧪 Tests + Formatting

• ⚫ toolkit fmt
• ⚫ toolkit clippy
• ⚫ toolkit test
• ⚫ toolkit test stdlib

📖 After Submitting

$nothing

🔍 For reviewers

$commands | where {|it| (not $it.treated) and ($it.approval == 0)} | each {|command|
    try {
        help $command.name | ignore
    } catch {|e|
        $"($command.name): ($e.msg)"
    }
}

should give no output in cargo run --features extra -- -n and a table with 16 lines in cargo run -- -n

[stormasm]

@amtoine I thought we were going to move the math commands and the bytes commands first prior to considering doing these ?

That is why I started with bits...

In our core team meeting a few weeks back we all agreed to do those first...

So I will let others comment on which commands they want to move across besides
math and bytes which everyone has already signed off on 😄

[stormasm]

However, I am OK with moving all of these commands across to nu-cmd-extra as well...

[stormasm]

I am fine with moving these commands across to nu-cmd-extra...
However we should get feedback from some other folks as well...
Just to make sure they are OK with it too. 😄

[amtoine]

@stormasm
i've asked this in the core team channel 😌

[amtoine]

i'll continue working on this in the meantime, this won't be lost work 👌

[amtoine]

@stormasm
some news and improvements here 😌

• i've solved the conflicts
• moved some functions and assets
• moved the missing ansi link command

now i'm trying to fix the tests but i have some trouble...
i was able to solve help_works_with_missing_requirements but now the examples of each while and update cells are failing and i do not understand what is the problem here 😕

[stormasm]

@amtoine see my comments to you in discord 😄

[amtoine]

cc/ @stormasm

the CI still is suspicious but i think this PR is somewhat unrelated to the CI issue.
as the jobs should all be 🟢 as in amtoine#4, i think we can land this, if you're still ok with the changes 😌

[stormasm]

Great job @amtoine