-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 87
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Amendment to licensing contract ( Refer to Issue #5 and PR #100 for more info ) #99
Comments
There is also the potential discussion of a CLA for down the road in the future, could apply to all pull-requests/commits & be added in as part of the "Contributor Guidelines" in a relatively easy way. Makes it simple to change license with a vote in the future if the fears about peoples efforts getting taken by a third-party company and going to waste remain. Could even help with those that are hesitant about the project atm aswell 🤔 An Example: For: |
Further discussion in pull request #100 |
Or another easy way which has support from the Linux Foundation: https://docs.linuxfoundation.org/lfx/easycla/v2-current/contributors/individual-contributor |
I was looking over the discussions on the licensing and tried to address them as best I could with an amended file and added clarity but wanted to run it by here first and get some thoughts before I open any kind of pull request 🙂
One example being where someone said that MIT doesn't deal with patents even though in precedent for multiple jurisdictions (inc European) it may be implied by the contract itself. #5
@nuta
Amendments Presented:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: