Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Offline page assets #85

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Aug 25, 2018
Merged

Offline page assets #85

merged 3 commits into from
Aug 25, 2018

Conversation

galvez
Copy link
Contributor

@galvez galvez commented Aug 24, 2018

I already tested this in my main test project, but can I have an extra pair of eyes here?

I'm using it like this:

      workbox: {
        offlinePage: '/offline/offline.html',
        offlinePageAssets: ['/offline/offline.png'],

I thought it was better to be able to specify offlinePage-specific assets rather than adding extra glob patterns to capture images in ~/assets.

@galvez galvez requested review from manniL and pi0 August 24, 2018 22:43
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Aug 25, 2018

Codecov Report

Merging #85 into develop will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@          Coverage Diff           @@
##           develop    #85   +/-   ##
======================================
  Coverage      100%   100%           
======================================
  Files            1      1           
  Lines            1      1           
======================================
  Hits             1      1

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update ef670b8...3e99108. Read the comment docs.

@pi0 pi0 merged commit 8bc4a3b into develop Aug 25, 2018
@manniL manniL deleted the offline-page-assets branch September 3, 2018 23:02
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants