Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add support for VitalSource Bookshelf #7155

Closed
nvdaes opened this issue May 8, 2017 · 2 comments
Closed

Add support for VitalSource Bookshelf #7155

nvdaes opened this issue May 8, 2017 · 2 comments
Milestone

Comments

@nvdaes
Copy link
Sponsor Contributor

nvdaes commented May 8, 2017

VitalSource Bookshelf is an ebook reader which presents ePUB documents in brouse mode, and allows navigation throught the whole document.
It's evaluated with NVDA 2017.1 as 96.3% of accessibility in considered essential features in the EPUBTest: Reading System Evaluations.
When menus or dialogs are opened and then closed reading book documents, a pane is focused and it's needed to use manual procedures to go back to the document (presented in browse mode). This is really anoying.
I've tested an add-on with an app module, which focuses the document when a pane gains focus.
Thanks.

@nvdaes
Copy link
Sponsor Contributor Author

nvdaes commented Oct 29, 2017

After reporting the broken link, a person of the DAISY Consortium suggests me to look at epubtest.org and then go to Accessibility.
I can't find the VitalSource Bookshelf for desktop now. I'll evaluate it with NVDA, as I've told to this person. For now I will use the add-on posted on the website, now under development, when it becomes stable.

Cheers

@nvaccessAuto nvaccessAuto added this to the 2018.1 milestone Jan 30, 2018
feerrenrut added a commit that referenced this issue Jan 30, 2018
Add support for VitalSource Bookshelf (Issue #7155)
@nvdaes
Copy link
Sponsor Contributor Author

nvdaes commented Jan 30, 2018

I use vitalSource Bookshelf as my main ePUB reader, so I'll try to take care if future versions of the program make necessary other changes.
Thanks

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants