Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

hi! result is bad! #18

Open
anthonyyuan opened this issue Oct 23, 2020 · 3 comments
Open

hi! result is bad! #18

anthonyyuan opened this issue Oct 23, 2020 · 3 comments

Comments

@anthonyyuan
Copy link

I test it .but result is bad.
seed8888
proj
seed0297

@obravo7
Copy link

obravo7 commented Oct 28, 2020

@anthonyyuan can you give some more details about the data that you used? E.g, you took a sub-sample of the original FFHQ (if so, how many images and what criteria did you use for your sample choice), etc.
If you used a custom data set, how did you obtain such data? Is there a large imbalance in your data (e.g, ratio of male to female/age/race)?

I ask because it might be a good indicator of how well the augmentation works dependent on the available data. I suspect that this works better if there is not such a high imbalance of the observed features (in this case, gender, age, race), but rather just a small data size.

I will also try it myself and inform of the observed results.

@anthonyyuan
Copy link
Author

I test this demo by your model and default var .I have not do train my data

@AlanLu0808
Copy link

I meet the same problem!I just test this demo by your model and default var. Just by running the command below.

 python generate.py --outdir=out --trunc=1 --seeds=5000-7000 --network=pretrained/ffhq.pkl

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants