Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix path for github action running tauri-wallet-tests #884

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Nov 11, 2021

Conversation

tommyv1987
Copy link
Contributor

. Applied prettier to the code base
. Removed delegation to gateway tests

. Add future tasks in product board for TS, And unbonding nodes / gateways.

. Applied prettier to the code base
. Removed delegation to gateway tests
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
{}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Are you sure this should be an empty config?

Also, be careful only using prettier because the root of the project has eslint (and no prettier). They will end up flip-flopping unless configured to work together. Look at https://prettier.io/docs/en/integrating-with-linters.html and use https://github.com/prettier/eslint-plugin-prettier to drive prettier.

I'm wondering if we should maybe do that work in another PR? Because it will likely mean a lot of formatting changes to the wallet JS/TS code.

Copy link
Contributor

@mmsinclair mmsinclair left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Other than my comment about prettier/eslint, I think we should just merge this and come back to sorting out linting/formatting later.

@mmsinclair mmsinclair merged commit 2f78f5e into develop Nov 11, 2021
@mmsinclair mmsinclair deleted the test/fix-gh-action branch November 11, 2021 10:33
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants