Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Proposed RFC Suggestion: Create a policy for SIGs to resolve AR test failures #26

Closed
AMZN-Dk opened this issue Jan 28, 2022 · 1 comment
Assignees
Labels
priority/major Major priority. Work that should be handled after all blocking and critical work is done. rfc-suggestion Request for Comments for a Suggestion triaged/needs-information An issue which needs clarification

Comments

@AMZN-Dk
Copy link
Collaborator

AMZN-Dk commented Jan 28, 2022

O3DE Suggestion RFC

Summary:

We are currently looking into tooling which will make it easier for SIGs to more easily and quickly identify both real and intermittent test failures, however the work to create this tooling will be wasted if SIGs do not use the information they provide to resolve the identified issues.

In order to continuously improve the AR system and reduce contributor frustration with intermittent test failures, we need a policy around how SIGs address failures in AR so they do not end up in an inactive backlog. It is important to get other SIG involvement in drafting and rolling out this policy in order to increase the likelihood of contributors adopting and putting this policy into practice, as it will likely not have as big of an impact if it is created by the testing SIG in isolation.

@AMZN-Dk AMZN-Dk added the rfc-suggestion Request for Comments for a Suggestion label Jan 28, 2022
@Kadino Kadino added the triaged/needs-information An issue which needs clarification label Feb 18, 2022
@Kadino Kadino removed their assignment Feb 18, 2022
@AMZN-Dk AMZN-Dk added the needs-priority Indicates issue lacks a priority/foo label and requires one. label May 10, 2022
@Kadino Kadino added priority/major Major priority. Work that should be handled after all blocking and critical work is done. and removed needs-priority Indicates issue lacks a priority/foo label and requires one. labels Jun 21, 2022
@Kadino
Copy link
Collaborator

Kadino commented Aug 16, 2022

Closing this stale issue, as there are other more-specific issues tracking similar changes. Please reopen or clarify as necessary.

@Kadino Kadino closed this as completed Aug 16, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
priority/major Major priority. Work that should be handled after all blocking and critical work is done. rfc-suggestion Request for Comments for a Suggestion triaged/needs-information An issue which needs clarification
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants