Proposed RFC Suggestion: Create a policy for SIGs to resolve AR test failures #26
Labels
priority/major
Major priority. Work that should be handled after all blocking and critical work is done.
rfc-suggestion
Request for Comments for a Suggestion
triaged/needs-information
An issue which needs clarification
O3DE Suggestion RFC
Summary:
We are currently looking into tooling which will make it easier for SIGs to more easily and quickly identify both real and intermittent test failures, however the work to create this tooling will be wasted if SIGs do not use the information they provide to resolve the identified issues.
In order to continuously improve the AR system and reduce contributor frustration with intermittent test failures, we need a policy around how SIGs address failures in AR so they do not end up in an inactive backlog. It is important to get other SIG involvement in drafting and rolling out this policy in order to increase the likelihood of contributors adopting and putting this policy into practice, as it will likely not have as big of an impact if it is created by the testing SIG in isolation.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: