New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

check FWHM #19

Closed

srio opened this issue Sep 9, 2016 · 2 comments

Member

srio commented Sep 9, 2016

it seems that the calculated FWHM is a bit underestimated
Eg, Gaussian source 1umx1um 1e6 rays 501 bins gives 2.32, 2.29

Member Author

srio commented Oct 1, 2016

The best thing would be to display in graphics the RMS value and the Histogram fit

Member Author

srio commented Aug 24, 2022

Done in ShadowOui

srio closed this as completed

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment