-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 49
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
sperm are not always ciliated #587
Comments
Sperm are not even always motile. This paper discusses the non-motile sperm of seed plants. So, it seems to me that there are at least three types of sperm cells:
|
Thank you for identifying this issue in CL It's actually worse as CL asserts it's an animal cell: While the focus of CL is metazoa, there is a need for an ontology to hold general groupings that span wider groups. Also CL should strive to use language that does not cause confusion. Calling something "sperm" that is more specific than the label suggests is an anti-pattern. (note that we can always have taxon-specific synonyms for a more mammalian centric subclass if we like) I propose
Can @obophenotype/cell-ontology editors indicate agreement/disagreement |
So how do cilia and nematode sperm fit in to this picture? |
Nematode sperm do not have a flagellum. They are ameboid. There is also an issue here if we want to include plants. If I recall correctly from my days as a developmental biologist, plants do not segregate their germ line (see the graph above). Comments from @tberardini or @vanaukenk might be helpful here. |
Does movement by pseudopod count as ameboid? In which case C.elegans sperm classified as ameboid sperm (from PMID:29879100). Peraps worth ading motile and non-motile sibling classes. |
See this paper PMID:19295707 |
I think that's a good idea. It seems to me that in order to make an equivalence axiom for the GO term 'sperm cell motility', it would be better to use a CL term 'motile sperm cell' rather than just 'sperm cell' since the latter isn't necessarily motile. So that would modify my earlier suggestion to this: -- sperm cell |
per the ticket: we remove the logical definition from CL sperm cell Addresses #587
addresses #587 CL_0011013 (motile sperm cell) CL_0011014 (non-motile sperm cell) CL_0011015 (amoeboid sperm cell)
is there action needed on this ticket? |
We need a release so we can import the new terms. |
I think this can be closed, please reopen if needed. |
To make a logical definition for sperm motility in GO, we need to be able to include sperm from organisms such as C. elegans. However, CL has this:
male gamete and (capable of some flagellated sperm motility) and (capable of some sperm capacitation)
and it is a subclass of ciliated cell (CL:0000064).
I'm also not certain that worm sperm undergo capacitation.
See PMID:29879100
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: