-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 29
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fixes #2912 add dorsal iris #2913
Conversation
This should be failing qc checks due to missing isa
…On Tue, Jun 6, 2023 at 4:29 AM PaulaDRoggli ***@***.***> wrote:
fixes #2912 <#2912>
------------------------------
You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at:
#2913
Commit Summary
- 1ff3286
<1ff3286>
fixes #2912
File Changes
(1 file <https://github.com/obophenotype/uberon/pull/2913/files>)
- *M* src/ontology/uberon-edit.obo
<https://github.com/obophenotype/uberon/pull/2913/files#diff-7dde9e81f71ce11962436529956798fa723e49d1bc8d188cc399d8009c2f72b4>
(8)
Patch Links:
- https://github.com/obophenotype/uberon/pull/2913.patch
- https://github.com/obophenotype/uberon/pull/2913.diff
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#2913>, or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAAMMONQIJR4B7EZFDTW6UTXJ3S5TANCNFSM6AAAAAAY4BXCLA>
.
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message
ID: ***@***.***>
|
Hi @cmungall I do not know how to model this term:
|
@cmungall, checking the |
#gogoeditdiff |
Here's a diff of how these changes impact the classified ontology (on -simple file):Ontology comparisonLeft
Right
Ontology importsOntology annotationsdorsal iris
|
Here's a diff of your edit file (unreasoned)Ontology comparisonLeft
Right
Ontology importsOntology annotationsdorsal iris
|
robot report MISSING_SUPERCLASS is too general. We would need something more bespoke, like "if it starts with UBERON: it needs to be an UBERON:anatomical entity" SPARQL thing. |
[Term] | ||
id: UBERON:8480063 | ||
name: dorsal iris | ||
def: "The dorsal part of the iris. This region is involved in lens regeneration in urodeles (newts and salamanders) in a process named Wolffian lens regeneration. In these species, lens regeneration proceeds through two steps. The first step involves the entire circumference of the iris pigmented epithelium. The second step is confined to the pigmented epithelial cells located along the dorsal rim of the iris and involves dorsal-specific activation of the Wnt signaling pathway." [PMID:17030116, PMID:29579253] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Consider keeping the first two sentences in the text definition and relegating the rest to a comment.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Also consider if a new GO term 'Wolffian lens regeneration' is warranted.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Indeed this term does not exist in GO. Should I make a NTR to GO?
@@ -224055,6 +224055,14 @@ relationship: dc-contributor https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0819-0473 | |||
relationship: part_of UBERON:0006767 ! head of femur | |||
property_value: dcterms-date "2023-05-30T06:34:18Z" xsd:dateTime | |||
|
|||
[Term] | |||
id: UBERON:8480063 | |||
name: dorsal iris |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If "dorsal rim of the iris" is an exact synonym, consider adding (dbxref PMID:29579253).
Since 'anatomical entity' (CARO:0000000) is inferred, should this still fail? |
@bvarner-ebi thanks for the input. I will make the changes in the definition and add the synonym. Should I try is_a "anatomical entity"? |
'anatomical entity' (CARO:0000000) is already inferred, so I don't think it needs to be manually asserted. I think adding superclass 'anatomical structure' would be reasonable. |
It needs a more specific term asserted.
I suggest UBERON:0000064 ! organ part
This isn't in the guide but it should be, sorry...
…On Tue, Jun 13, 2023 at 7:57 AM bvarner-ebi ***@***.***> wrote:
@bvarner-ebi <https://github.com/bvarner-ebi> thanks for the input. I
will make the changes in the definition and add the synonym. Should I try
is_a "anatomical entity"?
'anatomical entity' (CARO:0000000) is already inferred, so I don't think
it needs to be manually asserted. I think adding superclass 'anatomical
structure' would be reasonable.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#2913 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAGZRCGUUV66OK5X2IQVI6TXLB5U3ANCNFSM6AAAAAAY4BXCLA>
.
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message
ID: ***@***.***>
|
@bvarner-ebi I should add is_a organ part UBERON:0000064 instead of anatomical structure? |
Uberon considers eye to be a 'sense organ', which is an organ, and the text definition of 'organ part' is "A multicellular structure that is a part of an organ", so it seems reasonable. Also consider if adding 'has part' some 'iris epithelium' is appropriate. |
has part or overlaps? in organisms where dorsal iris is a meaningful subdivisions, are there parts of the iris epithelium that lie outside the dorsal iris? |
@cmungall @bvarner-ebi I don't think that there are parts of the dorsal iris epithelium that lie outside the dorsal iris |
@paulacalipho, if there is 'iris epithelium' that exists outside the 'dorsal iris', overlaps would be appropriate. |
@matentzn, can you kindly advise- did QC fail due to memory constraints? Any advice on how to proceed?
Last few rows of QC report:
|
@bvarner-ebi, Sometimes, if you run again it works :) |
fixes #2912