Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Ported this to v10 and got workflows back from v8 #163

Closed
eugen-don opened this issue Jan 15, 2017 · 2 comments
Closed

Ported this to v10 and got workflows back from v8 #163

eugen-don opened this issue Jan 15, 2017 · 2 comments

Comments

@eugen-don
Copy link
Member

eugen-don commented Jan 15, 2017

Hi guys i have ported the following apps to v10:
mgmtsystem, mgmtsystem_action, mgmtsystem_audit, mgmtsystem_hazard, mgmtsystem_nonconformity, mgmtsystem_review, mgmtsystem_survey.

My client had the following requirement:
The effectiveness review in the module mgmtsystem_nonconformity, needed to be packed into its own stage. And we decided to put the effectiveness review behind the progress stage, since it doesnt make sense to evaluate the effectiveness of a task, an action or a process which hasnt been finished yet.
In addition i was asked to migrate the workflows of approving the analysis and actionplan to version 10.0 which seem to have been discarded in the migration from 8.0 to 9.0.

Id like to know if there was any reason for discarding the concept of planning, or lets say entering data by person A, and getting it approved by person B (e.g. the Manager/ Superior). If there was actually a reason for discarding the workflows i could put them into a separate module.

Also i would like to know if it is acceptable to have the effectiveness review as a separate stage behind the progress stage? If this was acceptable i could drop my developement on the custom module for an additional stage and just modify the mgmtsystem_nonconformity to support the additional Stage in the workflow.

@max3903
Copy link
Member

max3903 commented Jan 16, 2017

Thanks @eugen-don.

👍 for the new stage

Can you please comment on the issue #159 and let us know the modules you migrated and their pull requests?

@eugen-don
Copy link
Member Author

eugen-don commented Mar 11, 2017

@max3903
Sorry for the wait, i got ill and wasnt able to work for a while...
heres the pull 1:
#165

pull 2 with rest of repo will ready in few days.

@max3903 max3903 closed this as completed Mar 13, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants