use .mllib -> .cmxs instead of .cmxa -> .cmxs
#140
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
The cmxs fix has been merged in master. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I'm continuing to explore the "simple" solutions to #131, after #139 that was unconvincing.
This one replaces the rule
.cmxa -> .cmxs, which makes it difficult to preserve the stubs and command flags, with a.mllib -> .cmxsas originally proposed by @dbuenzli and @Armael. The hope is that the general flag-gathering machinery, and the existing<foo.cmx>: ...tag lines in the user projects, will magically work out together to get exactly what is needed in the dynamic library. In presence of C stubs, it seems a bit too simple, see @dbuenzli's feature wish on this.