New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Draft OCapN netlayers specification #72
Conversation
I'm just wondering if everyone's had a chance to look at this and if there is any more feedback? |
I have had a chance to review, but have not :). If you'd like to hear from particular reviewers please make them a reviewer or assignee on the PR. A good way to make sure everyone reads is to put some kind of action of decision on the agenda for an upcoming meeting that requires prior review. |
important and worth noting that the designator and transport alone MUST be | ||
enough to differenciate between two locations, hints are not used for that. | ||
|
||
# Tor Onion Netlayer |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't see enough detail about the Tor netlayer to implement it.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think the differences between this draft and Agoric's preferences/plans are represented in open issues, so I'm fine with this going out, subject to change as we address those issues.
Based on the approval in #82, I'm going to merge this. |
No description provided.