Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Python-based ocropy faster than c++ version #78

Closed
crazylyf opened this issue Jan 16, 2016 · 2 comments
Closed

Python-based ocropy faster than c++ version #78

crazylyf opened this issue Jan 16, 2016 · 2 comments

Comments

@crazylyf
Copy link

Hello,
When I training text-line recognizer, I found Python-based ocropy is even faster than c++ version (on Red Hat 4.4.7, using ocropus-ltrain). This is very strange, as it is said CLSTM is faster than ocropy. Has anyone found the same phenomenon? What is the reason behind this?
Best,
Thanks!
@amitdo
Copy link
Contributor

amitdo commented Jan 21, 2016

Compile clstm llke this:

scons usemat=1
sudo scons usemat=1 install

With the 'usemat' option set on clstm will run much faster.

@amitdo
Copy link
Contributor

amitdo commented Feb 2, 2016

No longer relevant with the latest clstm master.

@tmbdev tmbdev closed this as completed Feb 4, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@tmbdev @crazylyf @amitdo