Fix musl build by checking whether execinfo.h's backtrace is present #602
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Admittedly I haven't tested it with musl, as I don't have it readily available, but I have tested without execinfo.h present, checking that it definitely used the "noop" implementation and vice-versa.
I noticed that the condition in
i_crash_noop.cpp
has!defined GEKKO
whereas the condition ini_crash_posix.cpp
has!defined GCONSOLE
. I get the impression they should be the same, so is that a mistake?Closes: #533