Outline of what content should be in what GitHub repository (ultimately)

[cmgrote]

To capture an overall strategic outline of what repositories we should have, and what content should be in each. Should form a "roadmap" that we gradually drive towards with separating out the core repository content + provide initial documentation for what all the repositories are, why the exist, and where to go for what.

[mandy-chessell]

This is about git repositories rather than open metadata repositories?

[github-actions]

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed in 20 days if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

[github-actions]

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed in 20 days if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

[planetf1]

This would likely belong in our docs where we have proposed to outline repository usage, and where we should include more process guidance.

[planetf1]

We have a list of repos in egeria-docs, and now have a template for new egeria repos.
Trying to be definitive on when to create repositories has been problematic, though we're erring towards smaller, simpler repos vs monorepos.
Therefore no particular action to be tracked by this issue -> suggest we close @cmgrote

[planetf1]

No further comments, so closing. please reopen if we need to discuss further