fix formatting

okfn · Apr 30, 2016 · 68f4aad · 68f4aad
1 parent 8beac75
commit 68f4aad
Showing 1 changed file with 32 additions and 32 deletions.
diff --git a/_posts/2015-12-10-notes-from-open-definition-call-december-2015.markdown b/_posts/2015-12-10-notes-from-open-definition-call-december-2015.markdown
@@ -31,36 +31,36 @@ categories:
 
 # Summary
 
-Authentication and Openness (and Open APIs)
-  * http://blog.ldodds.com/2015/11/25/how-can-open-data-publishers-monitor-usage/
-  * “I’ll note from the start that the open definition doesn’t have anything to say about whether a login is permitted or not permitted.”
-  * push to the list - is there some ambiguity - it has always been our view that requiring login is not open - do we need an FAQ or some explanation?  Openable?
-    * I’ve (Rufus) posted here :
-      * https://discuss.okfn.org/t/login-requirements-compliant-or-not-with-open-definition/1674 and we can discuss
-
-License Review Process Logistics
-  * where do we log requests / mentions?
-  * where do we maintain the list of in-review?
-  * where do we maintain the list of those that have gone through the process?
-  * do we maintain an archival copy?  if so, where? As attachment on the forum during discussion probably at least
-
-KOGL
- * ready to go : https://discuss.okfn.org/t/korea-open-government-license-kogl/899
-
-Scottish Parliament Open License v2.0
- * ready to go : https://discuss.okfn.org/t/scottish-parliament-open-licence-version-2-0/1646
-
-USA
- * is state and local level data automatically in the PD?  Luis responded on Forum.
-
-Plan for 2016
- * OSSD
- * Rufus: Promote 2.1 and engage publishers
-
-Forum
- * Herb to announce: list to go to moderated status - done
- * all communications to go to forum from this point forward
-
-Action:
- * Herb to discuss Chair logistics with Luis
+  * Authentication and Openness (and Open APIs)
+    * http://blog.ldodds.com/2015/11/25/how-can-open-data-publishers-monitor-usage/
+    * “I’ll note from the start that the open definition doesn’t have anything to say about whether a login is permitted or not permitted.”
+    * push to the list - is there some ambiguity - it has always been our view that requiring login is not open - do we need an FAQ or some explanation?  Openable?
+      * I’ve (Rufus) posted here :
+        * https://discuss.okfn.org/t/login-requirements-compliant-or-not-with-open-definition/1674 and we can discuss
+
+  * License Review Process Logistics
+    * where do we log requests / mentions?
+    * where do we maintain the list of in-review?
+    * where do we maintain the list of those that have gone through the process?
+    * do we maintain an archival copy?  if so, where? As attachment on the forum during discussion probably at least
+
+  * KOGL
+    * ready to go : https://discuss.okfn.org/t/korea-open-government-license-kogl/899
+
+  * Parliament Open License v2.0
+    * ready to go : https://discuss.okfn.org/t/scottish-parliament-open-licence-version-2-0/1646
+
+  * USA
+    * is state and local level data automatically in the PD?  Luis responded on Forum.
+
+  * Plan for 2016
+    * OSSD
+    * Rufus: Promote 2.1 and engage publishers
+
+  * Forum
+    * Herb to announce: list to go to moderated status - done
+    * all communications to go to forum from this point forward
+
+  * Action:
+    * Herb to discuss Chair logistics with Luis