-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 123
Commit
This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.
[homepage][s]: tweak summary of what openness means.
- Loading branch information
1 parent
c9468a7
commit 9e85321
Showing
1 changed file
with
5 additions
and
1 deletion.
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
9e85321
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
freely use_d_, forgot the letter "d"
9e85321
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Not a fan of this edit. Why go data-specific? And that isn't most succinct. For instance, "Open means free for any use by anyone" is shorter.
9e85321
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
As anyone reading lists lately would expect, I too object to the data-specific wording. Moreso, I find it really clunky and excessive to have two summary statements. I also dislike removing "access" from any list of qualities.
The solution if we want absolute succinctness could have a very short bold intro before the full definition, as in: