We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
FCL would greatly benefit from nested config values.
I.e.
fcl.config.get("foo") // {"bar": 123, "baz": 456} // where "foo.bar" = 123 & "foo.baz" = 456
This would also streamline setting configuration:
fcl.config({ foo: { bar: 123, baz: 456 } })
as users can now treat their configuration as a nested hierarchy instead of a flat map of values.
For backward-compatibility, both formats should be supported still.
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
Issue to be solved
FCL would greatly benefit from nested config values.
I.e.
This would also streamline setting configuration:
as users can now treat their configuration as a nested hierarchy instead of a flat map of values.
For backward-compatibility, both formats should be supported still.
Suggest A Solution
No response
What are you currently working on that this is blocking?
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: