[doc] Document the new Agama architecture #1033
Conversation
imobachgs
force-pushed
the
new-architecture
branch
from
fe71a64
to
8461b69
Compare
imobachgs
force-pushed
the
new-architecture
branch
from
8461b69
to
d2880b0
Compare
| Browser --> UI | ||
| Browser --> API | ||
| Browser <---> WS | ||
| CLI --> API |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
why it is one side to API? it is a bit confusing to me.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Because it is always a request/response. In the WS case, once you establish the connection, you might end up getting messages in both directions.
doc/new_architecture.md
Outdated
|
|
||
| The HTTP interface should allow authentication specifying a user and password that will be checked | ||
| against PAM. It is not clear yet, but we might need to check whether the logged user has permissions | ||
| (most probably through Policy Kit). |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Do we need to allow non root user for installation? Does it make sense at all?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
No, I do not think so. But I wondered whether the right question is: "do you have permissions?" instead of "are you root?". However, I only have a little experience with Polkit (which reminds me that the correct name is Polkit).
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Well, as user of installation you can do almost anything to system. So using just root makes it easier from my POV. For me better question is if we want to allow e.g. openssh keys instead of root password and enforce it. So customer can disable root password and enforce usage of ssh keys.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
In my opinion, that's a different (but related) topic. Anyway, we can keep the most probably through Polkit text and re-evaluate before implementing.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
And, yes, absolutely we should allow the users to inject their own SSH public keys.
imobachgs
force-pushed
the
new-architecture
branch
from
e0745fb
to
60de074
Compare
Prepare for releasing Agama 8. It includes the following pull requests: * #884 * #886 * #914 * #918 * #956 * #957 * #958 * #959 * #960 * #961 * #962 * #963 * #964 * #965 * #966 * #969 * #970 * #976 * #977 * #978 * #979 * #980 * #981 * #983 * #984 * #985 * #986 * #988 * #991 * #992 * #995 * #996 * #997 * #999 * #1003 * #1004 * #1006 * #1007 * #1008 * #1009 * #1010 * #1011 * #1012 * #1014 * #1015 * #1016 * #1017 * #1020 * #1022 * #1023 * #1024 * #1025 * #1027 * #1028 * #1029 * #1030 * #1031 * #1032 * #1033 * #1034 * #1035 * #1036 * #1038 * #1039 * #1041 * #1042 * #1043 * #1045 * #1046 * #1047 * #1048 * #1052 * #1054 * #1056 * #1057 * #1060 * #1061 * #1062 * #1063 * #1064 * #1066 * #1067 * #1068 * #1069 * #1071 * #1072 * #1073 * #1074 * #1075 * #1079 * #1080 * #1081 * #1082 * #1085 * #1086 * #1087 * #1088 * #1089 * #1090 * #1091 * #1092 * #1093 * #1094 * #1095 * #1096 * #1097 * #1098 * #1099 * #1100 * #1102 * #1103 * #1104 * #1105 * #1106 * #1109 * #1110 * #1111 * #1112 * #1114 * #1116 * #1117 * #1118 * #1119 * #1120 * #1121 * #1122 * #1123 * #1125 * #1126 * #1127 * #1128 * #1129 * #1130 * #1131 * #1132 * #1133 * #1134 * #1135 * #1136 * #1138 * #1139 * #1140 * #1141 * #1142 * #1143 * #1144 * #1145 * #1146 * #1147 * #1148 * #1149 * #1151 * #1152 * #1153 * #1154 * #1155 * #1156 * #1157 * #1158 * #1160 * #1161 * #1162 * #1163 * #1164 * #1165 * #1166 * #1167 * #1168 * #1169 * #1170 * #1171 * #1172 * #1173 * #1174 * #1175 * #1177 * #1178 * #1180 * #1181 * #1182 * #1183 * #1184 * #1185 * #1187 * #1188 * #1189 * #1190 * #1191 * #1192 * #1193 * #1194 * #1195 * #1196 * #1198 * #1199 * #1200 * #1201 * #1203 * #1204 * #1205 * #1206 * #1207 * #1208 * #1209 * #1210 * #1211 * #1212 * #1213 * #1214 * #1215 * #1216 * #1217 * #1219 * #1220 * #1221 * #1222 * #1223 * #1224 * #1225 * #1226 * #1227 * #1229
Add a document explaining the proposal for the new Agama architecture. Let's consider the document as a starting point for further discussion.
You can see the rendered version if you prefer.
PS: please, forgive me for those diagrams 馃槄