Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Incorrect axis order in GetCaps BoundingBox #14

Closed
asedgmen opened this issue Jun 25, 2018 · 1 comment
Closed

Incorrect axis order in GetCaps BoundingBox #14

asedgmen opened this issue Jun 25, 2018 · 1 comment

Comments

@asedgmen
Copy link

Description

This is a re-submission of the axis order problem reported in issue #4, whereby the coordinate axis order in WMS 1.3.0 GetCapabilities document BoundingBox elements with CRS=”EPSG:4326” is incorrect, e.g:
<BoundingBox CRS="EPSG:4326" minx="129.28" maxx="136.42" miny="-32.81" maxy="-10.51" />
should be
<BoundingBox CRS="EPSG:4326" minx="-32.81" maxx="-10.51" miny="129.28" maxy="136.42" />

What I Did

I inspected the GetCapabilities statement obtained from https://nrt-au.wms.gadevs.ga/?service=WMS&request=GetCapabilities (I understand that this implementation of the WMS has the latest code updates, including changes made when issue #4 was closed).

I believe this is causing the WMS layers to fail to load in QGIS, as it appears to use the BoundingBox elements to determine how to make the GetMap requests.

SpacemanPaul referenced this issue Jun 25, 2018
…r than "x" and "y" as their coordinate labels.
@SpacemanPaul
Copy link
Contributor

Oh I see. Previous fix just addressed the coordinate ordering in the BBOX request parameter.

Commit 325ce9f addresses the coordinate ordering in the GetCaps response.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants