Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix/wording and typo in ra #49

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jul 1, 2021
Merged
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion CHANGELOG.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
# Changelog

## Unreleased

- Fix some wording the the RA document, and adjust a table in the chapter 4.2.1 ([49](https://github.com/opendevstack/ods-document-generation-templates/pull/49))
### Fixed - 2021-04-22
- Fix the document history section for IVR still shows the wrong title ([#44](https://github.com/opendevstack/ods-document-generation-templates/pull/44))

Expand Down
15 changes: 5 additions & 10 deletions templates/RA.html.tmpl
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -154,12 +154,12 @@
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="content-wrappable">Description of Risks/Failures (or reason for GxP = No)</td>
<td class="content-wrappable">Description of possible risks or failures associated with the requirement or function. More than one risk or failure may be associated with a requirement or function
<td class="content-wrappable">Description of possible risks or failures associated with the requirement or function. More than one risk or failure may be associated with a requirement or function.<br/>
If non-GxP risks are not evaluated, reason for classification as non-GxP is provided.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="content-wrappable">Prob. of Occurrence</td>
<td class="content-wrappable">Relevance of the requirement or function for GxP or non-GxP (e.g. business). See section 4.2.1</td>
<td class="content-wrappable">Probability that the failure will occur.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="content-wrappable">Severity of Impact</td>
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -194,36 +194,30 @@
<tr>
<th>GxP Relevance</th>
<th>Value</th>
<th class="content-wrappable">GxP value in <a href="#section_5">section 5</a></th>
<th>Option</th>
<th>Description</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="lean">Yes</td>
<td class="content-wrappable">2</td>
<td class="content-wrappable">R2</td>
<td class="content-wrappable">n/a</td>
<td class="content-wrappable">The requirement is directly related to GxP regulated activities. Failures could lead to incorrect data, loss of data, deterioration of product quality, or risk exposure for safety of patients or customers.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="lean" rowspan="3">No</td>
<td class="content-wrappable">0</td>
<td class="content-wrappable">N0</td>
<td class="content-wrappable">n/a</td>
<td class="content-wrappable">Non-GxP risks are not being evaluated</td>
<td class="content-wrappable" rowspan="3">The requirement is directly related to GxP regulated activities. Failures could lead to incorrect data, loss of data, deterioration of product quality, or risk exposure for safety of patients or customers.</td>
<td class="content-wrappable" rowspan="3">The requirement has no GxP relevance. However, the requirement may have an impact on business. Failures could lead to e.g. system downtime, delay of submission process, loss of corporate reputation etc.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="content-wrappable">1</td>
<td class="content-wrappable">N1</td>
<td class="content-wrappable">Non-GxP risks are evaluated lower than GxP risks</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="content-wrappable">2</td>
<td class="content-wrappable">N2</td>
<td class="content-wrappable">Non-GxP risks are evaluated the same as GxP risks</td>
</tr>
</table>
<p>Each non-GxP risk can have a different option for evaluation since the RNP is computed automatically. Thus, no project-level evaluation option is used. The selection is done individually in each Risk Assessment task. The value contains the GxP relevance and the number used to compute the RPN.</p>

<h3 id="section_4_2_2"><span>4.2.2</span>Probability of Occurrence</h3>
{{#if data.sections.sec4s2s2.usesPoo}}
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -470,6 +464,7 @@

<div class="page">
<h2 id="section_8"><span>8</span>Document History</h2>
<p>The following table provides the history of the document.</p>
{{#if data.documentHistory}}
<table>
<tr>
Expand Down