-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Find out which MFEs should be in Olive #494
Comments
@jmakowski1123, FYI. (Copy-pasta from this) The following MFEs have at least one champion in the BTR group for inclusion/enablement by default in the
The following has an open PR for inclusion and no objections were raised, so it will be tested:
The following met no objections to "optional enablement", where there will be instruction in the Release Notes on how to get them running with Tutor, but they won't actually be part of the
Last but not least, the group thinks frontend-app-discussions will likely not meet requirements in time, but a suggestion was made to make it its own plugin. The question was raised: are the authors of frontend-app-discussions willing to create and maintain such a plugin? |
Looks like we want authn, too. So as of now, the list to aim for is:
|
frontend-app-course-authoring
Other considerations: The new XBlock editors feature depends (heavily) on a component that lives in the edx org (https://github.com/edx/frontend-lib-content-components/). Reportedly, however, the intention is to move it to openedx as capacity allows. |
frontend-app-discussions
Other considerations:
|
frontend-app-ora-grading
|
frontend-app-learner-record
|
frontend-app-authn
|
The above findings were documented as a matrix here: What's missing now is a decision by BTR on how to proceed, as none of them passed the bar fully. Hopefully we'll have one by tomorrow. |
See openedx/wg-build-test-release#200 (comment) for the conclusion. |
Investigate which MFEs should be included in Olive, from a product perspective with a technical feasibility in mind.
The BTR is tracking this question here:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: