You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I try to clean the get value function.
Doing this I figured out that there is might be a problem with actual code and alloc in irpp.
It's not a big deal as it's still virtual for now, but is was coded as it was simpler than it is in real.
I mean in some case, a familiy is on two declaration (non married couple) so what af should we put ? There is also more complicated case. My point is just that there is no order between fam and foy so a legislation should be explicit on that point.
I change the code by commenting these line and let af = 0 instead.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Comment by AlexisEidelman from Thursday May 30, 2013 at 16:17 GMT
I changed a little bit my mind.
Waiting doing something better, in these case of calling a fam entity at a foy level (or the opposite), by default, in these cases, I look for the value of the head of the entity. It definitely should be explicit but let's do it that way at the moment.
Issue by AlexisEidelman from Thursday May 30, 2013 at 15:32 GMT
Originally opened as https://github.com/openfisca/openfisca/issues/212
I try to clean the get value function.
Doing this I figured out that there is might be a problem with actual code and alloc in irpp.
It's not a big deal as it's still virtual for now, but is was coded as it was simpler than it is in real.
I mean in some case, a familiy is on two declaration (non married couple) so what af should we put ? There is also more complicated case. My point is just that there is no order between fam and foy so a legislation should be explicit on that point.
I change the code by commenting these line and let af = 0 instead.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: