Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Passing in relative experimental results in csv #7

Closed
hannahbrucemacdonald opened this issue Feb 28, 2020 · 0 comments
Closed

Passing in relative experimental results in csv #7

hannahbrucemacdonald opened this issue Feb 28, 2020 · 0 comments

Comments

@hannahbrucemacdonald
Copy link
Collaborator

hannahbrucemacdonald commented Feb 28, 2020

@jchodera pointed out that when we pass in the relative experimental errors, we don't check that they are self-consistent, plus we need a single absolute value such as to correctly offset the absolute plots anyway. ALSO this makes the tracking of experimental errors much more confusing.

The solution is to change the format of the csv file to be something like

### EXP
# lig, exp DG kcal/mol, exp dDG kcal/mol
a, -8.40, 0.22
b, -9.23, 0.33
c, -7.05, 0.22

### CALC
# ligA, ligB, calc DG kcal/mol, calc dDG kcal/mol
a, b, 1.32, 0.65
b, c, 3.45, 0.34

This format would also help with what @dfhahn spoke about with handling multiple simulation methods, we could just chain them together.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant