Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add Lomap conda package #5

Closed
richardjgowers opened this issue Feb 21, 2022 · 10 comments
Closed

Add Lomap conda package #5

richardjgowers opened this issue Feb 21, 2022 · 10 comments
Assignees

Comments

@richardjgowers
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@mikemhenry mikemhenry self-assigned this Feb 21, 2022
@mikemhenry
Copy link
Contributor

name on conda-forge: lomap2

@mikemhenry
Copy link
Contributor

@richardjgowers I need to make a release/tag for conda-forge, should I start at 0.1 or start somewhere else?

@dwhswenson
Copy link
Member

I'd vote 0.1 (or even 0.0.1). We're not promising a stable API in Lomap at this point, are we? If we want the first "fully-ready" version to be 2.0, we can always skip ahead to that.

@mikemhenry
Copy link
Contributor

I like 0.0.1 since it says "here be dragons" and I agree, we can jump versions once we are happy with it

@IAlibay
Copy link
Member

IAlibay commented Feb 24, 2022

I guess the question is "how much development of Lomap are we offering"?

As far as I understand our brief was "get Lomap working" and that was it. If that's the case then we've hit our brief and this is version 1.0.0.

@richardjgowers
Copy link
Contributor Author

There's also the fact that versions existed before us, so this is sort of v2-beta (we've broke stuff relative to v1 and this isn't everything we're breaking for v2)

@mikemhenry
Copy link
Contributor

I guess it is @richardjgowers call, are we at 1.0.0 or do we have some dev to do? I just need a tag/release to build the conda-forge package, so if we can decide on something else later if we want. 2.0.0-pre maybe? or something?

@mikemhenry
Copy link
Contributor

mikemhenry commented Feb 24, 2022

Okay I think v2.0.0-rc is the most proper and I will do that! (I will drop the v in the actual tag)

@mikemhenry
Copy link
Contributor

This issue will be resolved once conda-forge/staged-recipes#18154 is merged

@mikemhenry
Copy link
Contributor

Added!
conda-forge/staged-recipes#18154

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants