-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 37
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[PRE REVIEW]: Fruitbat: A Python Package for Estimating Redshifts of Fast Radio Bursts #1377
Comments
Hello human, I'm @whedon, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks. For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:
What happens now? This submission is currently in a You can help the editor by looking at this list of potential reviewers to identify individuals who might be able to review your submission (please start at the bottom of the list). Also, feel free to suggest individuals who are not on this list by mentioning their GitHub handles here. |
|
PDF failed to compile for issue #1377 with the following error: /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.4.0/bundler/gems/whedon-a1723d160bb6/lib/whedon.rb:91:in |
@abatten 👋 — could there be a typo in your ORCID? |
@xuanxu — The submitting author suggested you as handling editor, and it does look like your cup of tea. I'll assign you now, but let me know if you're disinclined for any reason. |
OK, the editor is @xuanxu |
The ORCID number seems to be correct. It might have failed because my ORCID account didn't have my middle initial. I've changed it now so hopefully it works. |
@whedon generate pdf |
|
PDF failed to compile for issue #1377 with the following error: /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.4.0/bundler/gems/whedon-a1723d160bb6/lib/whedon.rb:91:in |
Hmmm. Actually I did miss a number. Trying again. |
@whedon generate pdf |
|
👍 |
@whedon generate pdf |
|
I'm not sure why Whedon is struggling here. I've compiled the PDF locally: 10.21105.joss.01377.pdf |
Thanks @arfon. Looks like parts of the document didn't render as I'd expect them to. e.g missing citations, listing dot points and figure captions. I'll fix those up. |
@whedon generate pdf |
|
I'm wondering if Whedon is struggling because of the size of the logo: https://github.com/abatten/fruitbat/blob/master/logo/fruitbat_logo.png |
It could be. The logo isn't super important to the paper, just thought it would be nice. I'll remove it and see. |
Anyway, here's an update proof: 10.21105.joss.01377.pdf |
Or just resize it? If you want to try out the change, you can push a modification to a branch and then ask Whedon to compile the paper from that branch for testing (e.g. |
|
It looks like the very long author lists on the Planck papers is blowing up the memory usage on the Heroku PDF worker:
I'm not sure there's much we can do to easily fix this unless you can truncate that author list (they won't all render in the paper anyway)? |
Well that should be an easy fix! |
@whedon generate pdf from branch joss |
|
@whedon generate pdf from branch joss |
|
@whedon generate pdf from branch joss |
|
That's looking better. Feel free to add back in the logo now as I don't think this was the source of the problem. |
Actually it was also an issue. I tried with the logo and it couldn't generate the PDF for 14 minutes, so I have re-scaled the image to see if that now works. |
@whedon generate pdf from branch joss |
|
Alright! Looking good, I'll merge to paper development branch into master. |
@whedon generate pdf |
|
👋 @zingale: Would you be willing to review this paper? I think your expertise in Python and Astrophysics makes you a great fit for this submission. |
yes, I can review this. |
@zingale Great, thanks! I'll assign you and start the review issue now |
OK, the reviewer is @zingale |
@whedon start review |
OK, I've started the review over in #1399. Feel free to close this issue now! |
Submitting author: @abatten (Adam Batten)
Repository: https://github.com/abatten/fruitbat
Version: v1.0.0
Editor: @xuanxu
Reviewers: @zingale
Author instructions
Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @abatten. Currently, there isn't an JOSS editor assigned to your paper.
@abatten if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread. In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission.
Editor instructions
The JOSS submission bot @whedon is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @whedon can do for you type:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: