-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 37
-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 37
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[PRE REVIEW]: pybeach: A Python package for extracting the location of dune toes on beach profile transects #1887
Comments
Hello human, I'm @whedon, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks. For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:
For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:
What happens now? This submission is currently in a You can help the editor by looking at this list of potential reviewers to identify individuals who might be able to review your submission (please start at the bottom of the list). Also, feel free to suggest individuals who are not on this list by mentioning their GitHub handles here. |
|
👋 @kbarnhart — Could you take this submission as handling editor? |
@labarba I can be the handling editor. |
@whedon assign @kbarnhart as editor |
OK, the editor is @kbarnhart |
@TomasBeuzen if you have recommendations for reviewers please tag them on this thread. @csherwood-usgs, @dbuscombe-usgs would you be interested in reviewing this paper for the Journal of Open Source Software? The review process is a bit different than other academic journals. The streamlined review process takes place on GitHub and focuses on the software and a very short paper. This here is a pre-review issue. Once I've attracted sufficient reviewers I'll open a dedicated review issue where check-boxes guide you through the review process. |
Other potential reviewers: @ebgoldstein, @simmonsja, @ncohn, @edlazarus |
I'd be happy to review the python package. The other reviewers tagged are
also very good recommendations.
-Chris
…On Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 8:06 PM Tomas Beuzen ***@***.***> wrote:
Other potential reviewers: @ebgoldstein <https://github.com/ebgoldstein>,
@simmonsja <https://github.com/simmonsja>, @ncohn
<https://github.com/ncohn>, @edlazarus <https://github.com/edlazarus>
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#1887?email_source=notifications&email_token=AAMLIMYDPT63UWZWZ24434TQTNHIJA5CNFSM4JMMBQE2YY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGOED4QD6Q#issuecomment-553189882>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAMLIM2SNJKMJH5LTPQJFLLQTNHIJANCNFSM4JMMBQEQ>
.
--
*Christopher R. Sherwood* csherwood@usgs.gov
U.S. Geological Survey 384 Woods Hole Road Woods Hole MA 02543
774 269 9399 (cell) 508 457 2269 (office) 508 457 2310 (fax)
|
@csherwood-usgs thanks for being willing to review. I'm going to try and get 3 total reviewers, and then I'll open the dedicated review issue. @TomasBeuzen thanks for the recommendations. @ebgoldstein, @simmonsja, @ncohn, @edlazarus would you be interested in reviewing this paper for the Journal of Open Source Software? The review process is a bit different than other academic journals. The streamlined review process takes place on GitHub and focuses on the software and a very short paper. This here is a pre-review issue. Once I've attracted sufficient reviewers I'll open a dedicated review issue where check-boxes guide you through the review process. |
@whedon assign @csherwood-usgs as reviewer |
OK, the reviewer is @csherwood-usgs |
@kbarnhart I am happy to review as well |
Likewise – I'm happy to review.
Cheers,
Eli
…On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 9:06 PM Nick Cohn ***@***.***> wrote:
@kbarnhart <https://github.com/kbarnhart> I am happy to review as well
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#1887?email_source=notifications&email_token=ANNIBER2MTSWGBSG25VQ2E3QTRT3PA5CNFSM4JMMBQE2YY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGOED7UX6Y#issuecomment-553602043>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ANNIBEV4HPVJMSAJZJ54QWDQTRT3PANCNFSM4JMMBQEQ>
.
|
thanks @edlazarus and @ncohn for being willing to review. I'll add you here, and then start the review. |
@whedon add @edlazarus as reviewer |
OK, @edlazarus is now a reviewer |
OK, @ncohn is now a reviewer |
@whedon start review |
OK, I've started the review over in #1890. Feel free to close this issue now! |
Sorry I was late to the game! I'd be willing in the future |
Likewise a little late and I don't meet the COI criteria for Tom anyhow. Please feel free to consider me for JOSS reviews in the future! |
@dbuscombe-usgs and @simmonsja thanks for being willing to review in general. Consider adding yourself to the list of people willing to review for JOSS here. |
done! |
Submitting author: @TomasBeuzen (Tomas Beuzen)
Repository: https://github.com/TomasBeuzen/pybeach
Version: v0.1.1
Editor: @kbarnhart
Reviewers: @csherwood-usgs, @edlazarus, @ncohn
Author instructions
Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @TomasBeuzen. Currently, there isn't an JOSS editor assigned to your paper.
@TomasBeuzen if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread. In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission.
Editor instructions
The JOSS submission bot @whedon is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @whedon can do for you type:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: