Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[PRE REVIEW]: pybeach: A Python package for extracting the location of dune toes on beach profile transects #1887

Closed
whedon opened this issue Nov 13, 2019 · 26 comments

Comments

@whedon
Copy link

whedon commented Nov 13, 2019

Submitting author: @TomasBeuzen (Tomas Beuzen)
Repository: https://github.com/TomasBeuzen/pybeach
Version: v0.1.1
Editor: @kbarnhart
Reviewers: @csherwood-usgs, @edlazarus, @ncohn

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @TomasBeuzen. Currently, there isn't an JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@TomasBeuzen if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread. In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission.

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @whedon is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @whedon can do for you type:

@whedon commands
@whedon
Copy link
Author

whedon commented Nov 13, 2019

Hello human, I'm @whedon, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@whedon commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@whedon generate pdf

What happens now?

This submission is currently in a pre-review state which means we are waiting for an editor to be assigned and for them to find some reviewers for your submission. This may take anything between a few hours to a couple of weeks. Thanks for your patience 😸

You can help the editor by looking at this list of potential reviewers to identify individuals who might be able to review your submission (please start at the bottom of the list). Also, feel free to suggest individuals who are not on this list by mentioning their GitHub handles here.

@whedon
Copy link
Author

whedon commented Nov 13, 2019

Attempting PDF compilation. Reticulating splines etc...

@whedon
Copy link
Author

whedon commented Nov 13, 2019

@labarba
Copy link
Member

labarba commented Nov 13, 2019

👋 @kbarnhart — Could you take this submission as handling editor?
pybeach: A Python package for extracting the location of dune toes on beach profile transects
https://github.com/TomasBeuzen/pybeach

@kbarnhart
Copy link

@labarba I can be the handling editor.

@kbarnhart
Copy link

@whedon assign @kbarnhart as editor

@whedon
Copy link
Author

whedon commented Nov 13, 2019

OK, the editor is @kbarnhart

@kbarnhart
Copy link

@TomasBeuzen if you have recommendations for reviewers please tag them on this thread.

@csherwood-usgs, @dbuscombe-usgs would you be interested in reviewing this paper for the Journal of Open Source Software? The review process is a bit different than other academic journals. The streamlined review process takes place on GitHub and focuses on the software and a very short paper.

This here is a pre-review issue. Once I've attracted sufficient reviewers I'll open a dedicated review issue where check-boxes guide you through the review process.
Let me know if you have questions.

@TomasBeuzen
Copy link

Other potential reviewers: @ebgoldstein, @simmonsja, @ncohn, @edlazarus

@csherwood-usgs
Copy link

csherwood-usgs commented Nov 13, 2019 via email

@kbarnhart
Copy link

@csherwood-usgs thanks for being willing to review. I'm going to try and get 3 total reviewers, and then I'll open the dedicated review issue.

@TomasBeuzen thanks for the recommendations.

@ebgoldstein, @simmonsja, @ncohn, @edlazarus would you be interested in reviewing this paper for the Journal of Open Source Software? The review process is a bit different than other academic journals. The streamlined review process takes place on GitHub and focuses on the software and a very short paper.

This here is a pre-review issue. Once I've attracted sufficient reviewers I'll open a dedicated review issue where check-boxes guide you through the review process.
Let me know if you have questions.

@kbarnhart
Copy link

@whedon assign @csherwood-usgs as reviewer

@whedon whedon assigned csherwood-usgs and kbarnhart and unassigned kbarnhart Nov 13, 2019
@whedon
Copy link
Author

whedon commented Nov 13, 2019

OK, the reviewer is @csherwood-usgs

@ncohn
Copy link

ncohn commented Nov 13, 2019

@kbarnhart I am happy to review as well

@edlazarus
Copy link

edlazarus commented Nov 13, 2019 via email

@kbarnhart
Copy link

thanks @edlazarus and @ncohn for being willing to review. I'll add you here, and then start the review.

@kbarnhart
Copy link

@whedon add @edlazarus as reviewer

@whedon
Copy link
Author

whedon commented Nov 13, 2019

OK, @edlazarus is now a reviewer

@kbarnhart
Copy link

@whedon add @ncohn as reviewer

@whedon
Copy link
Author

whedon commented Nov 13, 2019

OK, @ncohn is now a reviewer

@kbarnhart
Copy link

@whedon start review

@whedon
Copy link
Author

whedon commented Nov 13, 2019

OK, I've started the review over in #1890. Feel free to close this issue now!

@dbuscombe-usgs
Copy link

Sorry I was late to the game! I'd be willing in the future

@simmonsja
Copy link

Likewise a little late and I don't meet the COI criteria for Tom anyhow. Please feel free to consider me for JOSS reviews in the future!

@kbarnhart
Copy link

@dbuscombe-usgs and @simmonsja thanks for being willing to review in general. Consider adding yourself to the list of people willing to review for JOSS here.

@dbuscombe-usgs
Copy link

done!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

9 participants