[PRE REVIEW]: mpl-interactions: A Python package for Interactive Matplotlib Figures

[editorialbot]

Submitting author: @ianhi (Ian Hunt-Isaak)
Repository: https://github.com/mpl-extensions/mpl-interactions
Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): joss
Version: 0.23.0
Editor: @ppxasjsm
Reviewers: @flekschas, @rgerum
Managing EiC: Arfon Smith

Status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/532b30e11db3c14503f5d6e2f5561004"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/532b30e11db3c14503f5d6e2f5561004/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/532b30e11db3c14503f5d6e2f5561004/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/532b30e11db3c14503f5d6e2f5561004)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @ianhi. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@ianhi if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands

[editorialbot]

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.1109/MCSE.2007.55 is OK

MISSING DOIs

- None

INVALID DOIs

- None

[editorialbot]

Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88  T=0.15 s (552.4 files/s, 397849.3 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
JSON                             5              0              0          48403
Python                          24            677           1437           2905
Jupyter Notebook                26              0           4314           1513
Markdown                        14            254              0            549
YAML                             8             27              7            204
INI                              1              6              0             70
DOS Batch                        1              8              1             26
TOML                             1              5              0             25
TeX                              1              1              0             20
make                             1              6              7             15
CSS                              1              1              2              9
HTML                             1              0              0              1
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                            84            985           5768          53740
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------


gitinspector failed to run statistical information for the repository

[editorialbot]

Wordcount for paper.md is 1322

[editorialbot]

👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈

[arfon]

@ianhi - thanks for your submission to JOSS. We're currently managing a large backlog of submissions and the editor most appropriate for your area is already rather busy.

For now, we will need to waitlist this paper and process it as the queue reduces. Thanks for your patience!

[ppxasjsm]

@editorialbot add @ppxasjsm as editor

[editorialbot]

Assigned! @ppxasjsm is now the editor

[ppxasjsm]

:wave @ianhi, I'll be your editor for this submission. It would be great if you could help me identify potential reviewers, then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission. I will also be away Tue-Fri next week, so will likely only get properly started with contacting reviewers the first week of July.

[ppxasjsm]

👋 @ianhi, if you could help with any reviewer suggestions that would be massively appreciated, thanks!

[ianhi]

Hi @ppxasjsm I'm sorry for the delay! I missed the initial message through a combination of attending a wedding and the subsequent holiday in the U.S. I'm now back and should be able to see messages much more promptly.

I spent some time searching the reviewer list and came up with the following as start. Happy to suggest more if need be.

flekschas - https://reviewers.joss.theoj.org/reviewers/2632
rgerum - https://reviewers.joss.theoj.org/reviewers/1336
paxtonfitzpatrick - https://reviewers.joss.theoj.org/reviewers/2369
arjunsavel - https://reviewers.joss.theoj.org/reviewers/1410
a-slide - https://reviewers.joss.theoj.org/reviewers/138
jkanche - https://reviewers.joss.theoj.org/reviewers/518
jonatanalvelid - https://reviewers.joss.theoj.org/reviewers/1803
desilinguist - https://reviewers.joss.theoj.org/reviewers/3
jochym - https://reviewers.joss.theoj.org/reviewers/54
rmhogervorst - https://reviewers.joss.theoj.org/reviewers/139
ranzhengcode - https://reviewers.joss.theoj.org/reviewers/2388

[ppxasjsm]

@ianhi thank you for your suggestions!

[ppxasjsm]

Hi @flekschas, would you be willing to review this JOSS submission?

[ppxasjsm]

Hi @rgerum, would you be willing to review this JOSS submission?

[rgerum]

Yes I can review this paper.

[flekschas]

@ppxasjsm I'm happy to review the submission but I might not get to it in the next two weeks as I am out for a conference and then on vacation. If that's okay with you I can likely get it done by some time in the week of July 24-28.

[ppxasjsm]

Thank you @flekschas, that's not a problem!

[ppxasjsm]

@editorialbot add @flekschas as reviewer

[editorialbot]

@flekschas added to the reviewers list!

[ppxasjsm]

Thank you @rgerum for agreeing to review this.

[ppxasjsm]

@editorialbot add @rgerum as reviewer

[editorialbot]

@rgerum added to the reviewers list!

[ppxasjsm]

@editorialbot start review

[editorialbot]

OK, I've started the review over in #5651.