Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[GCI-142] Delete unnecessary interface methods identifiers #2384

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

[GCI-142] Delete unnecessary interface methods identifiers #2384

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

BartlomiejRasztabiga
Copy link
Member

@BartlomiejRasztabiga BartlomiejRasztabiga commented Dec 5, 2017

Issue: https://issues.openmrs.org/browse/GCI-142
Related PR: #2366

I've deleted redundant interface method indentifiers e.g. "public", "static". Because all Java interfaces methods are by default public and static. I don't know if it's right with your coding conventions so forgive me :)

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+0.009%) to 56.584% when pulling dfcc11c on BartlomiejRasztabiga:GCI-142-7 into f9fdbf7 on openmrs:master.

@dkayiwa
Copy link
Member

dkayiwa commented Dec 7, 2017

In principle, i fully agree with you on this. 😊
But because it affects so many files, do you mind starting a discussion on Talk to get input from other developers?

@BartlomiejRasztabiga
Copy link
Member Author

@dkayiwa
Copy link
Member

dkayiwa commented Dec 13, 2017

This has merge conflicts. But then, am still a bit reluctant to merge this because of the trade off between the real value it adds and touching so many files leading to back porting merge conflicts.

@dkayiwa
Copy link
Member

dkayiwa commented Dec 17, 2017

@BartlomiejRasztabiga let me hope you are fine with closing this for now. We can always reopen it after reaching a consensus on the talk thread that you started. Feel free to share objections, if any. 😊

@dkayiwa dkayiwa closed this Dec 17, 2017
@BartlomiejRasztabiga BartlomiejRasztabiga deleted the GCI-142-7 branch January 1, 2018 10:12
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants