Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Replace ClassGraph classpath scanning with ServiceLoader or something else #3899

Open
vlsi opened this issue Jan 10, 2024 · 13 comments
Open
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@vlsi
Copy link

vlsi commented Jan 10, 2024

What problem are you trying to solve?

org.openrewrite.config.Environment.Builder#scanClassLoader causes OutOfMemoryError

Caused by: io.github.classgraph.ClassGraphException: Uncaught exception during scan
    at io.github.classgraph.ClassGraph.scan(ClassGraph.java:1637)
    at io.github.classgraph.ClassGraph.scan(ClassGraph.java:1654)
    at io.github.classgraph.ClassGraph.scan(ClassGraph.java:1667)
    at org.openrewrite.config.ClasspathScanningLoader.scanClasses(ClasspathScanningLoader.java:143)
    at org.openrewrite.config.ClasspathScanningLoader.<init>(ClasspathScanningLoader.java:74)
    at org.openrewrite.config.Environment$Builder.scanClassLoader(Environment.java:229)
Caused by: java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: Java heap space

It is hard to display in heap dump analysis, however, scanning Apache JMeter classpath triggers OOM with -Xmx2500m heap.

heap dump shows heap was consumed by classgraph

Describe the solution you'd like

OpenRewrite should either load recipes on demand or it should use ServiceLoader to locate services.
It would avoid spending time on classpath scan.

Have you considered any alternatives or workarounds?

Can OpenRewrite search the recipe when user requests the exact recipe name?

For instance:

Caused by: org.openrewrite.RecipeException: Recipes not found: org.openrewrite.java.testing.junit5.JUnit5BestPractices, org.openrewrite.java.testing.junit5.CleanupAssertions
    at org.openrewrite.config.Environment.activateRecipes(Environment.java:154)

Why throwing Recipes not found exception? Can it just request Class.forName("org.openrewrite.java.testing.junit5.JUnit5BestPractices") and or classLoader.getResources("META-INF/openrewrite/recipes.yml")? Then it won't need to scan all the classpath jars for every execution.

An alternative option could be adding https://github.com/smallrye/jandex annotation index, however, it would be an overkill.

Additional context

I am integrating OpenRewrite to Apache JMeter, and having OR trigger OOM is painful: apache/jmeter#6217

@vlsi vlsi added the enhancement New feature or request label Jan 10, 2024
@timtebeek
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for integrating OpenRewrite at apache/jmeter as well; neat to see how you're applying the tool. I've gone ahead and enabled ingesting apache/jmeter to the Moderne Platform as well, such that you can also use that to run recipes. It might take a bit of time to show up there, as I suspect it suffers from the same OOM issue, but when it does you'll find it in the Apache organization in https://app.moderne.io

I also like your suggestion to swap out ClassGraph, as indeed those OOM have come up before. Colleagues might be the better judge of that than I am at this point on the relative merits; perhaps @knutwannheden as a first judge on the viability?

@knutwannheden
Copy link
Contributor

@vlsi I have been thinking the same thing for a while now. Here some comments:

  1. To load an individual recipe we could indeed do something like Class#forName(), but note that we also have use cases (like the SaaS or CLI) where we indeed want to find all recipes.
  2. For the YAML sources we only know in which folder they reside (and what file extension they have). We don't know the full name

While I have used Jandex extensively while working on Quarkus projects, I am at this point unsure how it actually operates and is different from ClassGraph. But I don't think it is out of the question to replace ClassGraph with Jandex, if that solves our issues.

In the long term I would however also favor a ServiceLoader like approach. I was thinking that we would have to extend our build plugins with a task / goal which generate some resource file (with a known name). This file would then contain all details about recipes (declarative or not) present in the jar. In the context of this task / goal we could of course continue to use ClassGraph, as this would be a development time operation.

@vlsi
Copy link
Author

vlsi commented Jan 10, 2024

I am at this point unsure how it actually operates and is different from ClassGraph

The key difference is that one can build "annotation index" at the build time, and then it is much faster to load and process than scanning the files repeatedly.

In other words, as you build openrewrite-testing-frameworks.jar you could integrate jandex index there. Then it would be faster to query than parsing the classes.

However, ServiceLoader seems quite reasonable for the recipe discovery.
One more point for using ServiceLoader is that is is more-or-less supported by "dependency shading / uberjar" resource transformers. Everybody knows how to merge META-INF/services files. If you use jandex, the ones who shade openrewrite would have to suffer and invent their own "jandex merge tool".

auto-service might help creating META-INF/services files at the cost of annotation processing at the build time.

@vlsi
Copy link
Author

vlsi commented Jan 10, 2024

To load an individual recipe we could indeed do something like Class#forName(), but note that we also have use cases (like the SaaS or CLI) where we indeed want to find all recipes

ServiceLoader would support that as well.
The key idea behind ServiceLoader being fast is it uses a well-known filename like META-INF/services/org.openrewrite.Recipe. ClassLoader.getResources("META-INF/services/org.openrewrite.Recipe") would be much faster than analyzing every zip entry, parsing the classfile and verifying if the class extends Recipe or not.

The same should work for SaaS and CLI.

Of course, it would require adding META-INF/services to the jars with recipes. You might implement a fallback by adding a jar manifest entry that marks "this jar includes only recipes that have been migrated to services".

I've made the similar change in JMeter a year ago: apache/jmeter#5885

@knutwannheden
Copy link
Contributor

I think I would like the META-INF/services files to be transparent to the recipe author by having the files generated at build-time by our build plugin. What do you think about that?

@vlsi
Copy link
Author

vlsi commented Jan 10, 2024

generated at build-time by our build plugin

That is one of the options, however, how would you implement that?
Imagine someone creating a recipe, pardon me, in Kotlin ;)

How would you add META-INF/services transparently? Would you use kapt or https://github.com/ZacSweers/auto-service-ksp ?

I think it should be good enough to divert users to autoservice and/or manual META-INF/services creation samples.


generated at build-time by our build plugin

In my experience, it is much more useful to have a validator, however, it is a different topic.
For instance, if the user produces a jar with openrewrite recipes and styles, the validator could parse the yml and tell the user at the build time that the file is invalid, or it refers an non-existing style and so on.

@vlsi
Copy link
Author

vlsi commented Jan 10, 2024

The ultimate solution would be an openrewrite recipe that adds @AutoService(Recipe.class) for the recipes :)

@knutwannheden
Copy link
Contributor

I was thinking that the build plugin would use ClassGraph (or similar) the way it currently does to scan the Java class files and YAML files in the build output folder and generate some kind of manifest into the META-INF folder which then gets added to the jar. So it would not necessarily have to be a Java service.

@knutwannheden
Copy link
Contributor

It almost seems like producing and adding a Jandex index to the recipe jar would be the simplest solution as a first step. That would slightly increase the build time and recipe jar size, but would allow getting rid of the expensive scanning at runtime.

@vlsi
Copy link
Author

vlsi commented Jan 10, 2024

So it would not necessarily have to be a Java service.

Java service is something that has zero-arg constructor which you require for the recipe anyway.

Everything else (jandex indices or whatever) would require custom processing which might make it harder for the users, especially when it comes to shaded jars.

@timtebeek
Copy link
Contributor

Adding a small note here that some of the wider community of OpenRewrite recipe producers don't use the same Gradle build plugins, or even use Maven. So might be good to keep those in mind as well with any changes we produce here, that we ideally don't enforce any changes there.

@vlsi
Copy link
Author

vlsi commented Jan 11, 2024

I have not double-checked that, however, I think the root cause of ClassGraph-based scanning slowness is caused by the fact that ClassGraph has to process many more classes than needed: it scans all the classes in the classpath, including Gradle and its dependencies.

In other words, a low-hanging fruit here may be to list the jars that OpenRewrite needs to scan.
For instance, something like .overrideClasspath might help.

https://github.com/classgraph/classgraph/wiki/ClassGraph-Constructor-API#configuring-the-classgraph-instance
.overrideClasspath(String|URL... classpath) allows you to specify which paths to scan, overriding the classpath and the module path.

For instance, scanYamlResources takes ~1-1.2 sec for me (remember that ClassGraph is multithreaded), while a manual implementation that iterates over rewrite jars and looks for yml and yaml files takes ~140ms to load the yaml resources (~40ms to locate + 100ms to load).

@vlsi
Copy link
Author

vlsi commented Jan 11, 2024

Note: there is already .ignoreParentClassloader() in some of ClasspathScanningLoader methods, so the scan durations might be better for the current rewrite-gradle-plugin:

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
Status: Backlog
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants