OCPBUGS-14368: Default to kube-proxy health probes for Service type=LoadBalancer

[damdo]

This PR changes the default Protocol, Port and Path for Services of type=LoadBalancer kube-proxy based health probes to moving towards what is envisioned in the KEP-3836: Improve Kube-proxy ingress connectivity reliability and to fix the issues described in kubernetes-sigs#3499

[openshift-ci-robot]

@damdo: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-14368, which is valid.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug

• bug is open, matching expected state (open)
• bug target version (4.14.0) matches configured target version for branch (4.14.0)
• bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @sunzhaohua2

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

In response to this:

This PR changes the default Protocol, Port and Path for Services of type=LoadBalancer kube-proxy based health probes to moving towards what is envisioned in the KEP-3836: Improve Kube-proxy ingress connectivity reliability and to fix the issues described in kubernetes-sigs#3499

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[JoelSpeed]

Commit message prefix UPSTREAM: <carry>: should refer to the upstream PR, can you please update to UPSTREAM: 3887:

Otherwise I think this is ok.

Having reviewed what's going on here, and based on my comments upstream, I think this is safe to proceed with, I don't think this will break existing users

[damdo]

Ah yes, good point! Commit message updated.
Thanks @JoelSpeed

[JoelSpeed]

Ok, changes LGTM but I'd like to see how the techpreview jobs handle this, in particular a techpreview upgrade would be good to observe passing

[openshift-ci]

@damdo: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

[JoelSpeed]

/approve
/lgtm

[openshift-ci]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: JoelSpeed

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS [JoelSpeed]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[openshift-ci-robot]

@damdo: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-14368: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged:

• openshift/cloud-provider-azure#72

Jira Issue OCPBUGS-14368 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

In response to this:

This PR changes the default Protocol, Port and Path for Services of type=LoadBalancer kube-proxy based health probes to moving towards what is envisioned in the KEP-3836: Improve Kube-proxy ingress connectivity reliability and to fix the issues described in kubernetes-sigs#3499

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.