Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bug 1881534: Use internal load balancer instead of localhost 4.5 #455

Merged
merged 2 commits into from Sep 26, 2020

Conversation

tnozicka
Copy link
Contributor

@tnozicka tnozicka commented Sep 22, 2020

/cc @soltysh @deads2k

Backport of #441 (since #431 was reverted)

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the bugzilla/severity-high Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is high for the branch this PR is targeting. label Sep 22, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@tnozicka: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1881534, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

6 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target release (4.5.z) matches configured target release for branch (4.5.z)
  • bug is in the state ASSIGNED, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)
  • dependent bug Bugzilla bug 1842002 is in the state VERIFIED, which is one of the valid states (VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA))
  • dependent Bugzilla bug 1842002 targets the "4.6.0" release, which is one of the valid target releases: 4.6.0, 4.6.z
  • bug has dependents

In response to this:

Bug 1881534: Use internal load balancer instead of loclahost 4.5

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. labels Sep 22, 2020
@soltysh soltysh changed the title Bug 1881534: Use internal load balancer instead of loclahost 4.5 [release-4.5] Bug 1881534: Use internal load balancer instead of loclahost 4.5 Sep 23, 2020
Copy link
Member

@soltysh soltysh left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm
/retest

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Sep 24, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: soltysh, tnozicka

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@tnozicka: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1881534, which is valid.

6 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target release (4.5.z) matches configured target release for branch (4.5.z)
  • bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)
  • dependent bug Bugzilla bug 1842002 is in the state VERIFIED, which is one of the valid states (VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA))
  • dependent Bugzilla bug 1842002 targets the "4.6.0" release, which is one of the valid target releases: 4.6.0, 4.6.z
  • bug has dependents

In response to this:

[release-4.5] Bug 1881534: Use internal load balancer instead of loclahost 4.5

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@markmc
Copy link

markmc commented Sep 24, 2020

(patch manager) The PR linked from the 4.6 bug is #431 which is confusing. I see now that #431 was reverted and a new fix was merged in #441. I would have appreciated that explained clearly in the PR description. Added now.

@markmc
Copy link

markmc commented Sep 24, 2020

/retitle Bug 1881534: Use internal load balancer instead of localhost 4.5

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot changed the title [release-4.5] Bug 1881534: Use internal load balancer instead of loclahost 4.5 Bug 1881534: Use internal load balancer instead of localhost 4.5 Sep 24, 2020
@markmc markmc added the cherry-pick-approved Indicates a cherry-pick PR into a release branch has been approved by the release branch manager. label Sep 24, 2020
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

6 similar comments
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@knobunc
Copy link

knobunc commented Sep 26, 2020

/retest

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 0addafe into openshift:release-4.5 Sep 26, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@tnozicka: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged:

Bugzilla bug 1881534 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

In response to this:

Bug 1881534: Use internal load balancer instead of localhost 4.5

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. bugzilla/severity-high Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is high for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. cherry-pick-approved Indicates a cherry-pick PR into a release branch has been approved by the release branch manager. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

7 participants