Bug 2009722: acccount for image api returning invalid on imagestream create based on allowed/blocked registry settings #400

gabemontero · 2021-10-01T12:59:07Z

merge conflicts and multiple PRs #394 #397 required to fix in 4.10, so a manual cherry pick vs. using the cherry-pick bot is required for this one

…on allowed/blocked registry settings

…reation - on initial startup, as part of tbr check, bootstrap as removed - if the samples registry has been overridden, mark config invalid with new reason code

…n payload imagestreams

openshift-ci · 2021-10-01T12:59:12Z

@gabemontero: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2009722, which is invalid:

expected the bug to target the "4.9.0" release, but it targets "4.9.z" instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

gabemontero · 2021-10-01T15:19:00Z

/assign @dperaza4dustbit

cherry pick of the 2 4.10 / master branch PRs in the description to 4.9.z

ultimately going to backport this fix across the still supported OCP releases per https://access.redhat.com/support/policy/updates/openshift which most likely will mean back to 4.7, given 4.9 will GA soon

gabemontero · 2021-10-01T15:20:12Z

the okd failures are in the generic test sigs in each of those suites ... the samples related tests / sigs passed

/skip

to clear them out for tide

openshift-ci · 2021-10-01T15:20:40Z

@gabemontero: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name	Commit	Details	Required	Rerun command
ci/prow/okd-unit	`9952a2b`	link	true	`/test okd-unit`
ci/prow/okd-e2e-aws-operator	`9952a2b`	link	true	`/test okd-e2e-aws-operator`
ci/prow/okd-e2e-aws-builds	`9952a2b`	link	true	`/test okd-e2e-aws-builds`
ci/prow/okd-e2e-aws-upgrade	`9952a2b`	link	true	`/test okd-e2e-aws-upgrade`

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

gabemontero · 2021-10-01T15:20:50Z

aws vpc pain with e2e-aws-operator

/test e2e-aws-operator

/skip

dperaza4dustbit

/lgtm

openshift-ci · 2021-10-01T20:42:19Z

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: dperaza4dustbit, gabemontero

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

~~OWNERS~~ [dperaza4dustbit,gabemontero]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

openshift-bot · 2021-10-02T01:00:47Z

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

openshift-ci · 2021-10-02T01:00:51Z

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2009722, which is invalid:

expected the bug to target the "4.9.0" release, but it targets "4.9.z" instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-bot · 2021-10-03T01:00:23Z

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

openshift-ci · 2021-10-03T01:00:28Z

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2009722, which is invalid:

expected the bug to target the "4.9.0" release, but it targets "4.9.z" instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-bot · 2021-10-04T01:00:22Z

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

openshift-ci · 2021-10-04T01:00:26Z

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2009722, which is invalid:

expected the bug to target the "4.9.0" release, but it targets "4.9.z" instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-bot · 2021-10-05T01:00:40Z

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

openshift-ci · 2021-10-05T01:00:44Z

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2009722, which is invalid:

expected the bug to target the "4.9.0" release, but it targets "4.9.z" instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

gabemontero · 2021-10-05T12:43:51Z

yeah @dperaza4dustbit we are in "almost shipping 4.9 mode" in ocp, which means the pipeline is not accepting 4.9.z fixes yet;

so any bz that is not for a stop ship bug (like this one) has to sit and wait until 4.9 ships and we can get a valid bz label

openshift-bot · 2021-10-06T01:00:49Z

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

openshift-ci · 2021-10-06T01:00:53Z

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2009722, which is invalid:

expected the bug to target the "4.9.0" release, but it targets "4.9.z" instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-bot · 2021-10-07T01:01:14Z

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

openshift-ci · 2021-10-07T01:01:17Z

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2009722, which is invalid:

expected the bug to target the "4.9.0" release, but it targets "4.9.z" instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-bot · 2021-10-08T01:00:49Z

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

openshift-ci · 2021-10-08T01:00:53Z

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2009722, which is invalid:

expected the bug to target the "4.9.0" release, but it targets "4.9.z" instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-bot · 2021-10-09T01:01:14Z

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

openshift-ci · 2021-10-09T01:01:18Z

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2009722, which is invalid:

expected the bug to target the "4.9.0" release, but it targets "4.9.z" instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-bot · 2021-10-10T01:01:13Z

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

openshift-ci · 2021-10-10T01:01:17Z

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2009722, which is invalid:

expected the bug to target the "4.9.0" release, but it targets "4.9.z" instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-bot · 2021-10-11T01:00:42Z

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

openshift-ci · 2021-10-11T01:00:46Z

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2009722, which is invalid:

expected the bug to target the "4.9.0" release, but it targets "4.9.z" instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-bot · 2021-10-12T01:00:45Z

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

openshift-ci · 2021-10-12T01:00:49Z

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2009722, which is invalid:

expected the bug to target the "4.9.0" release, but it targets "4.9.z" instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-bot · 2021-10-13T01:01:05Z

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

openshift-ci · 2021-10-13T01:01:09Z

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2009722, which is invalid:

expected the bug to target the "4.9.0" release, but it targets "4.9.z" instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-bot · 2021-10-14T01:01:12Z

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

openshift-ci · 2021-10-14T01:01:16Z

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2009722, which is invalid:

expected the bug to target the "4.9.0" release, but it targets "4.9.z" instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-bot · 2021-10-15T01:01:00Z

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

openshift-ci · 2021-10-15T01:01:04Z

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2009722, which is invalid:

expected the bug to target the "4.9.0" release, but it targets "4.9.z" instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

sdodson · 2021-10-15T19:14:08Z

/bugzilla refresh

openshift-ci · 2021-10-15T19:14:16Z

@sdodson: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2009722, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

6 validation(s) were run on this bug

bug is open, matching expected state (open)
bug target release (4.9.z) matches configured target release for branch (4.9.z)
bug is in the state ASSIGNED, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)
dependent bug Bugzilla bug 2002368 is in the state VERIFIED, which is one of the valid states (VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENTRELEASE))
dependent Bugzilla bug 2002368 targets the "4.10.0" release, which is one of the valid target releases: 4.10.0
bug has dependents

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @jitendar-singh

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

dperaza4dustbit · 2021-11-10T04:00:28Z

/label backport-risk-assessed

tisutisu · 2021-11-12T08:18:25Z

/label cherry-pick-approved

openshift-ci · 2021-11-12T08:19:28Z

@gabemontero: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged:

openshift/cluster-samples-operator#400

Bugzilla bug 2009722 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

gabemontero added 4 commits October 1, 2021 08:53

acccount for image api returning invalid on imagestream create based …

f4a98c4

…on allowed/blocked registry settings

when global imagestream allowed/block registry prevents imagestream c…

6932ae9

…reation - on initial startup, as part of tbr check, bootstrap as removed - if the samples registry has been overridden, mark config invalid with new reason code

README updates around troublehsooting, only overriding CVO for dev, i…

b71cb59

…n payload imagestreams

fix proxy portion of tbr inaccessible check

9952a2b

openshift-ci bot added bugzilla/severity-medium Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is medium for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Oct 1, 2021

openshift-ci bot requested review from adambkaplan and coreydaley October 1, 2021 12:59

openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Oct 1, 2021

openshift-ci bot assigned dperaza4dustbit Oct 1, 2021

dperaza4dustbit approved these changes Oct 1, 2021

View reviewed changes

openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Oct 1, 2021

openshift-ci bot added bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. and removed bugzilla/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Oct 15, 2021

openshift-ci bot requested a review from jitendar-singh October 15, 2021 19:14

hardys mentioned this pull request Nov 8, 2021

[release-4.9] Bug 2010136: Including Template in must-gather related objects. #401

Merged

openshift-ci bot added the backport-risk-assessed Indicates a PR to a release branch has been evaluated and considered safe to accept. label Nov 10, 2021

openshift-ci bot added the cherry-pick-approved Indicates a cherry-pick PR into a release branch has been approved by the release branch manager. label Nov 12, 2021

openshift-merge-robot merged commit eb7466b into openshift:release-4.9 Nov 12, 2021

Bug 2009722: acccount for image api returning invalid on imagestream create based on allowed/blocked registry settings #400

Bug 2009722: acccount for image api returning invalid on imagestream create based on allowed/blocked registry settings #400

Conversation

gabemontero commented Oct 1, 2021

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 1, 2021

gabemontero commented Oct 1, 2021

gabemontero commented Oct 1, 2021

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 1, 2021 • edited

gabemontero commented Oct 1, 2021

dperaza4dustbit left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 1, 2021

openshift-bot commented Oct 2, 2021

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 2, 2021

openshift-bot commented Oct 3, 2021

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 3, 2021

openshift-bot commented Oct 4, 2021

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 4, 2021

openshift-bot commented Oct 5, 2021

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 5, 2021

gabemontero commented Oct 5, 2021

openshift-bot commented Oct 6, 2021

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 6, 2021

openshift-bot commented Oct 7, 2021

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 7, 2021

openshift-bot commented Oct 8, 2021

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 8, 2021

openshift-bot commented Oct 9, 2021

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 9, 2021

openshift-bot commented Oct 10, 2021

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 10, 2021

openshift-bot commented Oct 11, 2021

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 11, 2021

openshift-bot commented Oct 12, 2021

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 12, 2021

openshift-bot commented Oct 13, 2021

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 13, 2021

openshift-bot commented Oct 14, 2021

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 14, 2021

openshift-bot commented Oct 15, 2021

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 15, 2021

sdodson commented Oct 15, 2021

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 15, 2021

dperaza4dustbit commented Nov 10, 2021

tisutisu commented Nov 12, 2021

openshift-ci bot commented Nov 12, 2021

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 1, 2021 •

edited