CONSOLE-3705: Phase 1 of using OpenShift Dynamic Plugin SDK #13188

vojtechszocs · 2023-09-22T15:23:13Z

This PR updates Console dynamic plugin build-time infrastructure to use webpack code from OpenShift Dynamic Plugin SDK.

Console runtime plugin infrastructure is updated to support both current (legacy) and new (standard) plugin manifest formats.

Console plugins built with updated ConsoleRemotePlugin will use the standard PluginManifest format.

There are two structural differences between Console legacy vs. standard plugin manifest format:

1. Console specific properties

legacy: top-level properties in the manifest

"displayName": "Console Demo Plugin",
"description": "Plasma reactors online. Initiating hyper drive.",
"disableStaticPlugins": ["@console/demo-plugin"]

standard: scoped to customProperties object under the console namespace

"customProperties": {
  "console": {
    "displayName": "Console Demo Plugin",
    "description": "Plasma reactors online. Initiating hyper drive.",
    "disableStaticPlugins": ["@console/demo-plugin"]
  }
}

2. Additional build metadata

legacy: no properties, Console code uses hard-coded conventions
standard: new top-level properties in the manifest

"registrationMethod": "callback",
"baseURL": "/api/plugins/console-demo-plugin/",
"loadScripts": ["plugin-entry.js"],
"buildHash": "8740a41586612419c90da43d82c69fb8"

Updated ConsoleRemotePlugin should be backwards compatible. Its options can be omitted entirely:

new ConsoleRemotePlugin(),

or specified explicitly as needed:

new ConsoleRemotePlugin({
  // [added] pluginMetadata - default: parsed from `consolePlugin` object in `package.json` file
  // [added] extensions - default: parsed from `console-extensions.json` file
  // validateExtensionSchema - default: true
  // validateExtensionIntegrity - default: true
  // validateSharedModules - default: true
  // [deleted] validatePackageSchema - plugin metadata validation now done via Yup
}),

Env. variable CONSOLE_PLUGIN_SKIP_EXT_VALIDATOR is no longer supported by ConsoleRemotePlugin since we already have an explicit option for this purpose (validateExtensionIntegrity).

Other notable changes:

@openshift-console/dynamic-plugin-sdk-webpack now depends on @openshift/dynamic-plugin-sdk-webpack
removed support for very old Console plugins (where plugin SDK packages use webpack 5.0.0-beta.16)

cc @spadgett @jhadvig

openshift-ci-robot · 2023-09-22T15:43:01Z

@vojtechszocs: This pull request references CONSOLE-3705 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the story to target the "4.15.0" version, but no target version was set.

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-ci-robot · 2023-09-27T22:11:39Z

@vojtechszocs: This pull request references CONSOLE-3705 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the story to target the "4.15.0" version, but it targets "openshift-4.15" instead.

In response to this:

Depends on openshift/dynamic-plugin-sdk#236

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-ci-robot · 2023-10-03T15:48:16Z

@vojtechszocs: This pull request references CONSOLE-3705 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the story to target the "4.15.0" version, but it targets "openshift-4.15" instead.

In response to this:

Depends on changes in openshift/dynamic-plugin-sdk#236 and openshift/dynamic-plugin-sdk#232

TODO description

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-ci-robot · 2023-10-11T18:41:37Z

@vojtechszocs: This pull request references CONSOLE-3705 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the story to target the "4.15.0" version, but it targets "openshift-4.15" instead.

In response to this:

Depends on some changes changes in OpenShift dynamic plugin SDK:

CONSOLE-3705: Allow transforming plugin manifest at build time dynamic-plugin-sdk#236

RHCLOUD-27198: Improve Cypress testing of sample plugin host application dynamic-plugin-sdk#232

Validate dependency values in DynamicRemotePlugin dynamic-plugin-sdk#239

TODO description

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-ci-robot · 2023-10-11T19:34:38Z

@vojtechszocs: This pull request references CONSOLE-3705 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the story to target the "4.15.0" version, but it targets "openshift-4.15" instead.

In response to this:

Depends on some changes changes in OpenShift dynamic plugin SDK:

CONSOLE-3705: Allow transforming plugin manifest at build time dynamic-plugin-sdk#236

RHCLOUD-27198: Improve Cypress testing of sample plugin host application dynamic-plugin-sdk#232

Validate dependency values in DynamicRemotePlugin dynamic-plugin-sdk#239

Disallow empty string dependency values in DynamicRemotePlugin dynamic-plugin-sdk#240

TODO description

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

vojtechszocs · 2023-10-12T16:08:22Z

frontend/package.json

@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@
    "integration-tests"
  ],
  "scripts": {
-    "postinstall": "yarn generate",
+    "postinstall": "# TODO yarn generate",


This is a temporary change 😃

frontend/packages/console-dynamic-plugin-sdk/README.md

@@ -100,8 +100,6 @@ a [semver pre-release](https://semver.org/#spec-item-9) identifier, adapt your s
 to include the relevant pre-release prefix, e.g. use `~4.11.0-0.ci` when targeting pre-release versions
 like `4.11.0-0.ci-1234`.

-See `ConsolePluginMetadata` type for details on the `consolePlugin` object and its schema.


vojtechszocs · 2023-10-12T16:10:23Z

frontend/packages/console-dynamic-plugin-sdk/package.json

@@ -17,12 +17,13 @@
  },
  "devDependencies": {
    "@microsoft/tsdoc": "0.14.2",
+    "@openshift/dynamic-plugin-sdk-webpack": "file:/home/vszocs/work/openshift/dynamic-plugin-sdk/packages/lib-webpack",


Using local OpenShift plugin SDK build for now, this will be updated once PR is no longer a draft.

vojtechszocs · 2023-10-13T12:51:29Z

Tested locally on dynamic-demo-plugin and everything seems to work as expected for both

demo plugin built with current Console plugin SDK
demo plugin built with updated Console plugin SDK (with changes in this PR)

openshift-ci-robot · 2023-10-16T18:06:37Z

@vojtechszocs: This pull request references CONSOLE-3705 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the story to target the "4.15.0" version, but it targets "openshift-4.15" instead.

In response to this:

This PR updates Console dynamic plugin build-time infrastructure to use webpack code from OpenShift Dynamic Plugin SDK.

Console runtime plugin infrastructure is updated to support both current (legacy) and new (standard) plugin manifest formats.

Console plugins built with updated ConsoleRemotePlugin will use the standard PluginManifest format.

There are two structural differences between Console legacy vs. standard plugin manifest format:

1. Console specific properties

legacy: top-level properties in the manifest
"displayName": "Console Demo Plugin",
"description": "Plasma reactors online. Initiating hyper drive.",
"disableStaticPlugins": ["@console/demo-plugin"]
standard: scoped to customProperties object under the console namespace
"customProperties": {
 "console": {
   "displayName": "Console Demo Plugin",
   "description": "Plasma reactors online. Initiating hyper drive.",
   "disableStaticPlugins": ["@console/demo-plugin"]
 }
}
2. Additional build metadata

legacy: no properties, Console code uses hard-coded conventions

standard: new top-level properties in the manifest
"registrationMethod": "callback",
"baseURL": "/api/plugins/console-demo-plugin/",
"loadScripts": ["plugin-entry.js"],
"buildHash": "8740a41586612419c90da43d82c69fb8"
Updated ConsoleRemotePlugin should be backwards compatible. Its options can be omitted entirely:
new ConsoleRemotePlugin(),
or specified explicitly as needed:
new ConsoleRemotePlugin({
 // [added] pluginMetadata - default: parsed from `consolePlugin` object in `package.json` file
 // [added] extensions - default: parsed from `console-extensions.json` file
 // validateExtensionSchema - default: true
 // validateExtensionIntegrity - default: true
 // validateSharedModules - default: true
 // [deleted] validatePackageSchema - plugin metadata validation now done via Yup
}),
Env. variable CONSOLE_PLUGIN_SKIP_EXT_VALIDATOR is no longer supported by ConsoleRemotePlugin since we already have an explicit option for this purpose (validateExtensionIntegrity).

Other notable changes:

@openshift-console/dynamic-plugin-sdk-webpack now depends on @openshift/dynamic-plugin-sdk-webpack

removed support for very old Console plugins (where plugin SDK packages use webpack 5.0.0-beta.16)

cc @spadgett @jhadvig

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

TheRealJon · 2023-11-20T16:12:25Z

/lgtm cancel

Looks like the dynamic demo plugin e2e tests are failing. Might be a legit regression.

vojtechszocs · 2023-11-22T20:13:53Z

/test e2e-gcp-console

TheRealJon · 2023-11-22T20:50:46Z

/retest

cluster install failed

TheRealJon

/lgtm

openshift-ci · 2023-11-22T20:51:36Z

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: TheRealJon, vojtechszocs

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

~~dynamic-demo-plugin/OWNERS~~ [TheRealJon,vojtechszocs]
~~frontend/OWNERS~~ [TheRealJon,vojtechszocs]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

jhadvig · 2023-11-23T11:56:10Z

level=info msg=Waiting up to 40m0s (until 9:58PM UTC) for the cluster at https://api.ci-op-mxqfn55k-75d12.xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:6443/ to initialize...
level=error msg=Cluster operator authentication Degraded is True with OAuthServerRouteEndpointAccessibleController_SyncError: OAuthServerRouteEndpointAccessibleControllerDegraded: Get "https://oauth-openshift.apps.ci-op-mxqfn55k-75d12.xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/healthz": dial tcp: lookup oauth-openshift.apps.ci-op-mxqfn55k-75d12.XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX on 172.30.0.10:53: no such host (this is likely result of malfunctioning DNS server)
level=error msg=Cluster operator authentication Available is False with OAuthServerRouteEndpointAccessibleController_EndpointUnavailable: OAuthServerRouteEndpointAccessibleControllerAvailable: Get "https://oauth-openshift.apps.ci-op-mxqfn55k-75d12.XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX/healthz": dial tcp: lookup oauth-openshift.apps.ci-op-mxqfn55k-75d12.XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX on 172.30.0.10:53: no such host (this is likely result of malfunctioning DNS server)
level=info msg=Cluster operator baremetal Disabled is False with : 
level=info msg=Cluster operator cloud-controller-manager TrustedCABundleControllerControllerAvailable is True with AsExpected: Trusted CA Bundle Controller works as expected
level=info msg=Cluster operator cloud-controller-manager TrustedCABundleControllerControllerDegraded is False with AsExpected: Trusted CA Bundle Controller works as expected
level=info msg=Cluster operator cloud-controller-manager CloudConfigControllerAvailable is True with AsExpected: Cloud Config Controller works as expected
level=info msg=Cluster operator cloud-controller-manager CloudConfigControllerDegraded is False with AsExpected: Cloud Config Controller works as expected
level=info msg=Cluster operator cloud-controller-manager CloudControllerOwner is True with AsExpected: Cluster Cloud Controller Manager Operator owns cloud controllers at 4.15.0-0.ci.test-2023-11-22-[205](https://prow.ci.openshift.org/view/gs/origin-ci-test/pr-logs/pull/openshift_console/13188/pull-ci-openshift-console-master-e2e-gcp-console/1727429461328007168#1:build-log.txt%3A205)139-ci-op-mxqfn55k-latest
level=info msg=Cluster operator console Progressing is True with SyncLoopRefresh_InProgress: SyncLoopRefreshProgressing: Working toward version 4.15.0-0.ci.test-2023-11-22-205139-ci-op-mxqfn55k-latest, 0 replicas available
level=error msg=Cluster operator console Available is False with Deployment_InsufficientReplicas::RouteHealth_FailedGet: DeploymentAvailable: 0 replicas available for console deploymen

/retest

jhadvig · 2023-11-27T12:06:49Z

QE Approver:
/assign @yanpzhan
Docs Approver:
/assign @opayne1
PX Approver:
/assign @RickJWagner

opayne1 · 2023-11-27T15:04:57Z

/label docs-approved

RickJWagner · 2023-11-27T19:31:13Z

/label px-approved

yanpzhan · 2023-11-28T13:23:56Z

@vojtechszocs I checked on cluster launched against the pr, and deployed console-crontab-plugin and console-demo-plugin successfully. If there are other checkpoints need to be covered?

vojtechszocs · 2023-11-28T15:21:34Z

@vojtechszocs I checked on cluster launched against the pr, and deployed console-crontab-plugin and console-demo-plugin successfully. If there are other checkpoints need to be covered?

Hi @yanpzhan - I think the above basic checks should be enough 😃

yanpzhan · 2023-11-29T02:51:22Z

Thanks all.
/label qe-approved

openshift-ci-robot · 2023-11-29T02:51:28Z

@vojtechszocs: This pull request references CONSOLE-3705 which is a valid jira issue.

In response to this:

This PR updates Console dynamic plugin build-time infrastructure to use webpack code from OpenShift Dynamic Plugin SDK.

Console runtime plugin infrastructure is updated to support both current (legacy) and new (standard) plugin manifest formats.

Console plugins built with updated ConsoleRemotePlugin will use the standard PluginManifest format.

There are two structural differences between Console legacy vs. standard plugin manifest format:

1. Console specific properties

legacy: top-level properties in the manifest
"displayName": "Console Demo Plugin",
"description": "Plasma reactors online. Initiating hyper drive.",
"disableStaticPlugins": ["@console/demo-plugin"]
standard: scoped to customProperties object under the console namespace
"customProperties": {
 "console": {
   "displayName": "Console Demo Plugin",
   "description": "Plasma reactors online. Initiating hyper drive.",
   "disableStaticPlugins": ["@console/demo-plugin"]
 }
}
2. Additional build metadata

legacy: no properties, Console code uses hard-coded conventions

standard: new top-level properties in the manifest
"registrationMethod": "callback",
"baseURL": "/api/plugins/console-demo-plugin/",
"loadScripts": ["plugin-entry.js"],
"buildHash": "8740a41586612419c90da43d82c69fb8"
Updated ConsoleRemotePlugin should be backwards compatible. Its options can be omitted entirely:
new ConsoleRemotePlugin(),
or specified explicitly as needed:
new ConsoleRemotePlugin({
 // [added] pluginMetadata - default: parsed from `consolePlugin` object in `package.json` file
 // [added] extensions - default: parsed from `console-extensions.json` file
 // validateExtensionSchema - default: true
 // validateExtensionIntegrity - default: true
 // validateSharedModules - default: true
 // [deleted] validatePackageSchema - plugin metadata validation now done via Yup
}),
Env. variable CONSOLE_PLUGIN_SKIP_EXT_VALIDATOR is no longer supported by ConsoleRemotePlugin since we already have an explicit option for this purpose (validateExtensionIntegrity).

Other notable changes:

@openshift-console/dynamic-plugin-sdk-webpack now depends on @openshift/dynamic-plugin-sdk-webpack

removed support for very old Console plugins (where plugin SDK packages use webpack 5.0.0-beta.16)

cc @spadgett @jhadvig

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-ci-robot · 2023-11-29T08:51:04Z

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 78189a2 and 2 for PR HEAD dd6de65 in total

openshift-ci-robot · 2023-11-30T06:46:32Z

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD b5d67e3 and 1 for PR HEAD dd6de65 in total

openshift-ci · 2023-11-30T15:44:50Z

@vojtechszocs: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

openshift-bot · 2023-11-30T17:12:01Z

[ART PR BUILD NOTIFIER]

This PR has been included in build openshift-enterprise-console-container-v4.15.0-202311301610.p0.g70a927c.assembly.stream for distgit openshift-enterprise-console.
All builds following this will include this PR.

vojtechszocs marked this pull request as draft September 22, 2023 15:23

openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Sep 22, 2023

openshift-ci bot requested review from christianvogt and jcaianirh September 22, 2023 15:25

openshift-ci bot added component/sdk Related to console-plugin-sdk approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. labels Sep 22, 2023

vojtechszocs changed the title ~~WiP Phase 1 of using OpenShift Dynamic Plugin SDK~~ CONSOLE-3705: WiP Phase 1 of using OpenShift Dynamic Plugin SDK Sep 22, 2023

openshift-ci-robot added the jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. label Sep 22, 2023

vojtechszocs force-pushed the adopt-openshift-plugin-sdk branch from 5095576 to 774cedf Compare September 26, 2023 17:29

vojtechszocs force-pushed the adopt-openshift-plugin-sdk branch from 774cedf to 96afc41 Compare October 12, 2023 16:02

openshift-merge-robot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Oct 12, 2023

openshift-ci bot added the component/core Related to console core functionality label Oct 12, 2023

vojtechszocs commented Oct 12, 2023

View reviewed changes

vojtechszocs force-pushed the adopt-openshift-plugin-sdk branch from 96afc41 to e2ce6e9 Compare October 13, 2023 12:25

vojtechszocs changed the title ~~CONSOLE-3705: WiP Phase 1 of using OpenShift Dynamic Plugin SDK~~ CONSOLE-3705: Phase 1 of using OpenShift Dynamic Plugin SDK Oct 13, 2023

vojtechszocs force-pushed the adopt-openshift-plugin-sdk branch from e2ce6e9 to 20f5650 Compare October 13, 2023 12:56

openshift-merge-robot removed the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Oct 13, 2023

vojtechszocs force-pushed the adopt-openshift-plugin-sdk branch from 20f5650 to 3b20f5a Compare October 13, 2023 14:14

vojtechszocs force-pushed the adopt-openshift-plugin-sdk branch from 3b20f5a to d1c7b90 Compare November 16, 2023 17:20

vojtechszocs marked this pull request as ready for review November 16, 2023 17:22

openshift-ci bot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Nov 16, 2023

openshift-ci bot removed the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Nov 20, 2023

vojtechszocs force-pushed the adopt-openshift-plugin-sdk branch 2 times, most recently from 4436274 to b8bb412 Compare November 21, 2023 17:43

openshift-merge-robot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Nov 21, 2023

vojtechszocs force-pushed the adopt-openshift-plugin-sdk branch from b8bb412 to 7467ca7 Compare November 22, 2023 16:32

Phase 1 of using OpenShift Dynamic Plugin SDK

dd6de65

vojtechszocs force-pushed the adopt-openshift-plugin-sdk branch from 7467ca7 to dd6de65 Compare November 22, 2023 19:01

openshift-merge-robot removed the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Nov 22, 2023

TheRealJon approved these changes Nov 22, 2023

View reviewed changes

openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Nov 22, 2023

openshift-ci bot added the docs-approved Signifies that Docs has signed off on this PR label Nov 27, 2023

openshift-ci bot added the px-approved Signifies that Product Support has signed off on this PR label Nov 27, 2023

openshift-ci bot added the qe-approved Signifies that QE has signed off on this PR label Nov 29, 2023

openshift-merge-bot bot merged commit 70a927c into openshift:master Nov 30, 2023
6 checks passed

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

CONSOLE-3705: Phase 1 of using OpenShift Dynamic Plugin SDK #13188

CONSOLE-3705: Phase 1 of using OpenShift Dynamic Plugin SDK #13188

vojtechszocs commented Sep 22, 2023 •

edited

openshift-ci-robot commented Sep 22, 2023 •

edited by openshift-ci bot

openshift-ci-robot commented Sep 27, 2023 •

edited by openshift-ci bot

openshift-ci-robot commented Oct 3, 2023 •

edited by openshift-ci bot

openshift-ci-robot commented Oct 11, 2023 •

edited by openshift-ci bot

openshift-ci-robot commented Oct 11, 2023 •

edited by openshift-ci bot

vojtechszocs Oct 12, 2023

This comment was marked as resolved.

vojtechszocs Oct 12, 2023

vojtechszocs commented Oct 13, 2023

openshift-ci-robot commented Oct 16, 2023 •

edited by openshift-ci bot

TheRealJon commented Nov 20, 2023

vojtechszocs commented Nov 22, 2023

TheRealJon commented Nov 22, 2023

TheRealJon left a comment

openshift-ci bot commented Nov 22, 2023

jhadvig commented Nov 23, 2023

jhadvig commented Nov 27, 2023

opayne1 commented Nov 27, 2023

RickJWagner commented Nov 27, 2023

yanpzhan commented Nov 28, 2023

vojtechszocs commented Nov 28, 2023

yanpzhan commented Nov 29, 2023

openshift-ci-robot commented Nov 29, 2023 •

edited by openshift-ci bot

openshift-ci-robot commented Nov 29, 2023

openshift-ci-robot commented Nov 30, 2023

openshift-ci bot commented Nov 30, 2023

openshift-bot commented Nov 30, 2023

CONSOLE-3705: Phase 1 of using OpenShift Dynamic Plugin SDK #13188

CONSOLE-3705: Phase 1 of using OpenShift Dynamic Plugin SDK #13188

Conversation

vojtechszocs commented Sep 22, 2023 • edited

openshift-ci-robot commented Sep 22, 2023 • edited by openshift-ci bot

openshift-ci-robot commented Sep 27, 2023 • edited by openshift-ci bot

openshift-ci-robot commented Oct 3, 2023 • edited by openshift-ci bot

openshift-ci-robot commented Oct 11, 2023 • edited by openshift-ci bot

openshift-ci-robot commented Oct 11, 2023 • edited by openshift-ci bot

vojtechszocs Oct 12, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

This comment was marked as resolved.

vojtechszocs Oct 12, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

vojtechszocs commented Oct 13, 2023

openshift-ci-robot commented Oct 16, 2023 • edited by openshift-ci bot

TheRealJon commented Nov 20, 2023

vojtechszocs commented Nov 22, 2023

TheRealJon commented Nov 22, 2023

TheRealJon left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

openshift-ci bot commented Nov 22, 2023

jhadvig commented Nov 23, 2023

jhadvig commented Nov 27, 2023

opayne1 commented Nov 27, 2023

RickJWagner commented Nov 27, 2023

yanpzhan commented Nov 28, 2023

vojtechszocs commented Nov 28, 2023

yanpzhan commented Nov 29, 2023

openshift-ci-robot commented Nov 29, 2023 • edited by openshift-ci bot

openshift-ci-robot commented Nov 29, 2023

openshift-ci-robot commented Nov 30, 2023

openshift-ci bot commented Nov 30, 2023

openshift-bot commented Nov 30, 2023

vojtechszocs commented Sep 22, 2023 •

edited

openshift-ci-robot commented Sep 22, 2023 •

edited by openshift-ci bot

openshift-ci-robot commented Sep 27, 2023 •

edited by openshift-ci bot

openshift-ci-robot commented Oct 3, 2023 •

edited by openshift-ci bot

openshift-ci-robot commented Oct 11, 2023 •

edited by openshift-ci bot

openshift-ci-robot commented Oct 11, 2023 •

edited by openshift-ci bot

openshift-ci-robot commented Oct 16, 2023 •

edited by openshift-ci bot

openshift-ci-robot commented Nov 29, 2023 •

edited by openshift-ci bot