Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add tasks and triggers pages in console #5744

Merged

Conversation

divyanshiGupta
Copy link
Contributor

@divyanshiGupta divyanshiGupta commented Jun 16, 2020

Jira Story - https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ODC-4007

In this PR I have added tasks and triggers pages to pipelines nav in console, created custom task-runs list page and added filters to pipeline-resources list page.

Screenshot:
image

image

Note -
This PR has a dependency on #5700

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the component/core Related to console core functionality label Jun 16, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the component/dev-console Related to dev-console label Jun 16, 2020
@divyanshiGupta divyanshiGupta force-pushed the admin-pipelines branch 3 times, most recently from a2156d7 to 41a4d11 Compare June 17, 2020 16:21
Copy link
Contributor

@andrewballantyne andrewballantyne left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm
/hold

Looks good, holding for dependant PR to merge.

@@ -46,3 +46,15 @@ export const pipelineRunStatusFilter = (phases, pipeline) => {
const status = pipelineRunFilterReducer(pipeline);
return phases.selected.has(status) || !_.includes(phases.all, status);
};

export const pipelineResourceFilterReducer = (pipelineResource): string => {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Was going to suggest types here, but there is a circular dependency between these files 🤦 Okay. Part of the tech debt.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Jun 18, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jun 18, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jun 19, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jun 19, 2020
@andrewballantyne
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm
/retest

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jun 19, 2020
Copy link
Contributor

@andrewballantyne andrewballantyne left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/hold cancel

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Jun 19, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: andrewballantyne, divyanshiGupta

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit c185ef8 into openshift:master Jun 19, 2020
@spadgett spadgett added this to the v4.6 milestone Jun 24, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. component/core Related to console core functionality component/dev-console Related to dev-console lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants