[release-4.6] Bug 1960545: Overly generic CSS rules for dd and dt elements breaks styling elsewhere in console #8926

openshift-cherrypick-robot · 2021-05-14T07:37:08Z

This is an automated cherry-pick of #8901

/assign spadgett

…tyling elsewhere in console Bug-Url: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1959550 Signed-off-by: Aviv Turgeman <aturgema@redhat.com>

openshift-ci · 2021-05-14T07:37:19Z

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: Bugzilla bug 1959550 has been cloned as Bugzilla bug 1960545. Retitling PR to link against new bug.
/retitle [release-4.6] Bug 1960545: Overly generic CSS rules for dd and dt elements breaks styling elsewhere in console

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-ci · 2021-05-14T07:37:24Z

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1960545, which is invalid:

expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1959550 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENTRELEASE), but it is MODIFIED instead
expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1959550 to target a release in 4.7.0, 4.7.z, but it targets "4.8.0" instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

spadgett

/lgtm

openshift-ci · 2021-05-14T16:09:39Z

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: openshift-cherrypick-robot, spadgett

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

~~frontend/packages/kubevirt-plugin/OWNERS~~ [spadgett]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

openshift-bot · 2021-05-15T01:00:57Z

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

openshift-ci · 2021-05-15T01:01:01Z

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1960545, which is invalid:

expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1959550 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENTRELEASE), but it is ON_QA instead
expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1959550 to target a release in 4.7.0, 4.7.z, but it targets "4.8.0" instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-bot · 2021-05-16T01:00:50Z

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

openshift-ci · 2021-05-16T01:00:54Z

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1960545, which is invalid:

expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1959550 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENTRELEASE), but it is ON_QA instead
expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1959550 to target a release in 4.7.0, 4.7.z, but it targets "4.8.0" instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-bot · 2021-05-17T01:00:55Z

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

openshift-ci · 2021-05-17T01:01:00Z

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1960545, which is invalid:

expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1959550 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENTRELEASE), but it is ON_QA instead
expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1959550 to target a release in 4.7.0, 4.7.z, but it targets "4.8.0" instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-bot · 2021-05-18T01:00:54Z

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

openshift-ci · 2021-05-18T01:00:58Z

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1960545, which is invalid:

expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1959550 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENTRELEASE), but it is ON_QA instead
expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1959550 to target a release in 4.7.0, 4.7.z, but it targets "4.8.0" instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-bot · 2021-05-19T01:01:00Z

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

openshift-ci · 2021-05-19T01:01:04Z

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1960545, which is invalid:

expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1959550 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENTRELEASE), but it is ON_QA instead
expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1959550 to target a release in 4.7.0, 4.7.z, but it targets "4.8.0" instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-bot · 2021-05-20T01:00:35Z

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

openshift-ci · 2021-05-20T01:00:39Z

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1960545, which is invalid:

expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1959550 to target a release in 4.7.0, 4.7.z, but it targets "4.8.0" instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-bot · 2021-05-21T01:01:14Z

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

openshift-ci · 2021-05-21T01:01:18Z

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1960545, which is invalid:

expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1959550 to target a release in 4.7.0, 4.7.z, but it targets "4.8.0" instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-bot · 2021-05-22T01:00:33Z

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

openshift-bot · 2021-05-25T01:00:46Z

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

openshift-ci · 2021-05-25T01:00:49Z

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1960545, which is invalid:

expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1959550 to target a release in 4.7.0, 4.7.z, but it targets "4.8.0" instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

yaacov · 2021-05-25T05:19:35Z

/bugzilla refresh

openshift-ci · 2021-05-25T05:19:39Z

@yaacov: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1960545, which is invalid:

expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1960544 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENTRELEASE), but it is POST instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-bot · 2021-05-26T01:00:47Z

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

openshift-ci · 2021-05-26T01:00:51Z

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1960545, which is invalid:

expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1960544 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENTRELEASE), but it is POST instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-bot · 2021-05-27T01:00:29Z

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

openshift-ci · 2021-05-27T01:00:32Z

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1960545, which is invalid:

expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1960544 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENTRELEASE), but it is MODIFIED instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-bot · 2021-05-28T01:00:49Z

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

openshift-ci · 2021-05-28T01:00:53Z

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1960545, which is invalid:

expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1960544 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENTRELEASE), but it is ON_QA instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-bot · 2021-05-29T01:00:40Z

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

openshift-ci · 2021-05-29T01:00:44Z

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1960545, which is invalid:

expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1960544 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENTRELEASE), but it is ON_QA instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-bot · 2021-05-30T01:00:42Z

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

openshift-ci · 2021-05-30T01:00:46Z

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1960545, which is invalid:

expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1960544 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENTRELEASE), but it is ON_QA instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-bot · 2021-05-31T01:00:41Z

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

openshift-ci · 2021-05-31T01:00:45Z

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1960545, which is invalid:

expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1960544 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENTRELEASE), but it is ON_QA instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-bot · 2021-06-01T01:00:24Z

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

openshift-ci · 2021-06-01T01:00:27Z

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1960545, which is invalid:

expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1960544 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENTRELEASE), but it is ON_QA instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-bot · 2021-06-02T01:01:07Z

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

openshift-ci · 2021-06-02T01:01:10Z

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1960545, which is invalid:

expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1960544 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENTRELEASE), but it is ON_QA instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-bot · 2021-06-03T01:00:49Z

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

openshift-ci · 2021-06-03T01:00:53Z

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1960545, which is invalid:

expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1960544 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENTRELEASE), but it is ON_QA instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

yaacov · 2021-06-03T05:04:13Z

/bugzilla refresh

openshift-ci · 2021-06-03T05:04:18Z

@yaacov: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1960545, which is valid.

6 validation(s) were run on this bug

bug is open, matching expected state (open)
bug target release (4.6.z) matches configured target release for branch (4.6.z)
bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)
dependent bug Bugzilla bug 1960544 is in the state VERIFIED, which is one of the valid states (VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENTRELEASE))
dependent Bugzilla bug 1960544 targets the "4.7.z" release, which is one of the valid target releases: 4.7.0, 4.7.z
bug has dependents

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @gouyang

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-ci · 2021-06-10T23:26:46Z

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged:

openshift/console#8926

Bugzilla bug 1960545 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Bug 1959550: Overly generic CSS rules for dd and dt elements breaks s…

d9dbff0

…tyling elsewhere in console Bug-Url: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1959550 Signed-off-by: Aviv Turgeman <aturgema@redhat.com>

openshift-cherrypick-robot mentioned this pull request May 14, 2021

Bug 1959550: Overly generic CSS rules for dd and dt elements breaks styling elsewhere in console #8901

Merged

openshift-ci bot assigned spadgett May 14, 2021

openshift-ci bot changed the title ~~[release-4.6] Bug 1959550: Overly generic CSS rules for dd and dt elements breaks styling elsewhere in console~~ [release-4.6] Bug 1960545: Overly generic CSS rules for dd and dt elements breaks styling elsewhere in console May 14, 2021

openshift-ci bot added the bugzilla/severity-medium Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is medium for the branch this PR is targeting. label May 14, 2021

openshift-ci bot added the bugzilla/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. label May 14, 2021

openshift-ci bot requested review from mareklibra and pcbailey May 14, 2021 07:37

openshift-ci bot added the component/kubevirt Related to kubevirt-plugin label May 14, 2021

spadgett approved these changes May 14, 2021

View reviewed changes

openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label May 14, 2021

openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label May 14, 2021

openshift-ci bot added bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. and removed bugzilla/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Jun 3, 2021

openshift-ci bot requested a review from gouyang June 3, 2021 05:04

ecordell added the cherry-pick-approved Indicates a cherry-pick PR into a release branch has been approved by the release branch manager. label Jun 10, 2021

openshift-merge-robot merged commit 6cf7ac2 into openshift:release-4.6 Jun 10, 2021

[release-4.6] Bug 1960545: Overly generic CSS rules for dd and dt elements breaks styling elsewhere in console #8926

[release-4.6] Bug 1960545: Overly generic CSS rules for dd and dt elements breaks styling elsewhere in console #8926

Conversation

openshift-cherrypick-robot commented May 14, 2021

openshift-ci bot commented May 14, 2021

openshift-ci bot commented May 14, 2021

spadgett left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

openshift-ci bot commented May 14, 2021

openshift-bot commented May 15, 2021

openshift-ci bot commented May 15, 2021

openshift-bot commented May 16, 2021

openshift-ci bot commented May 16, 2021

openshift-bot commented May 17, 2021

openshift-ci bot commented May 17, 2021

openshift-bot commented May 18, 2021

openshift-ci bot commented May 18, 2021

openshift-bot commented May 19, 2021

openshift-ci bot commented May 19, 2021

openshift-bot commented May 20, 2021

openshift-ci bot commented May 20, 2021

openshift-bot commented May 21, 2021

openshift-ci bot commented May 21, 2021

openshift-bot commented May 22, 2021

openshift-bot commented May 25, 2021

openshift-ci bot commented May 25, 2021

yaacov commented May 25, 2021

openshift-ci bot commented May 25, 2021

openshift-bot commented May 26, 2021

openshift-ci bot commented May 26, 2021

openshift-bot commented May 27, 2021

openshift-ci bot commented May 27, 2021

openshift-bot commented May 28, 2021

openshift-ci bot commented May 28, 2021

openshift-bot commented May 29, 2021

openshift-ci bot commented May 29, 2021

openshift-bot commented May 30, 2021

openshift-ci bot commented May 30, 2021

openshift-bot commented May 31, 2021

openshift-ci bot commented May 31, 2021

openshift-bot commented Jun 1, 2021

openshift-ci bot commented Jun 1, 2021

openshift-bot commented Jun 2, 2021

openshift-ci bot commented Jun 2, 2021

openshift-bot commented Jun 3, 2021

openshift-ci bot commented Jun 3, 2021

yaacov commented Jun 3, 2021

openshift-ci bot commented Jun 3, 2021

openshift-ci bot commented Jun 10, 2021