New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
BUILD-353: csi driver, crd name changes #9
BUILD-353: csi driver, crd name changes #9
Conversation
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: gabemontero The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
manifests/05_clusterrole.yaml
Outdated
@@ -271,7 +271,8 @@ rules: | |||
- apiGroups: | |||
- sharedresource.openshift.io | |||
resources: | |||
- shares | |||
- sharedConfigs |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
notice up in line 272 here .... with all the various rename churn, we missed changing this to what is now the "old" value, storage.openshift.io
we go lucky, in that we wanted on sharedresource.openshift.io
I suspect the e2e-aws-csi-driver will fail until openshift/csi-driver-shared-resource#55 merges if it doesn't, we may need to investigate whey @adambkaplan @coreydaley |
the failure was
Maybe I missed a spot? |
OK it is from openshift/api: ./vendor/github.com/openshift/api/operator/v1/types_csi_cluster_driver.go: SharedResourcesCSIDriver CSIDriverName = "csi.shared-resources.openshift.io" so when @coreydaley 's openshift/api openshift/api#979 with the renames land, we vendor the update here, and we go from there presumably openshift/csi-driver-shared-resource#55 will merge before all that |
In general it looks good, I hope the CI issues will solved soon 👍🏼 |
actually we'll need minimally openshift/api#1019 to merge and vendor that in as part of this PR before we can move forward I don't think we need @coreydaley to vendor in openshift/api#979 and openshift/api#1019 into the driver repo to get the e2e's to pass from here, given my previous BUILD-353 efforts, but the proof will be in the e2e run |
c97e5ea
to
483bac5
Compare
swell ... go-vet is reporting errors in CI I am not seeing locally investigating |
483bac5
to
3c56ad5
Compare
nuked all of /vendor locally then rebuilt ... I think it added the missing dir's CI's go vet was complaining about otherwise, may still need to vendor in again after openshift/api#1023 merges (yet another rename spot we missed that @coreydaley just discovered) |
yeah looks like we need openshift/api#1023 merged and vendored in here |
in case openshift/csi-driver-shared-resource#57 has some bearing /retest |
perhaps this was dependent on promotion / mirroring that took place recently /retest |
3c56ad5
to
00f0b8f
Compare
seemingly unrelated cluster install problem this time /retest |
manifests/05_clusterrole.yaml
Outdated
@@ -271,7 +271,8 @@ rules: | |||
- apiGroups: | |||
- sharedresource.openshift.io | |||
resources: | |||
- shares | |||
- sharedConfigs |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Should this be sharedconfigmaps
?
- sharedConfigs | |
- sharedconfigmaps |
manifests/05_clusterrole.yaml
Outdated
@@ -271,7 +271,8 @@ rules: | |||
- apiGroups: | |||
- sharedresource.openshift.io | |||
resources: | |||
- shares | |||
- sharedConfigs | |||
- sharedSecrets |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think this should be sharedsecrets
- sharedSecrets | |
- sharedsecrets |
00f0b8f
to
afbed8d
Compare
thanks @coreydaley - update pushed / fingers crossed |
manifests/05_clusterrole.yaml
Outdated
@@ -271,7 +271,8 @@ rules: | |||
- apiGroups: | |||
- sharedresource.openshift.io | |||
resources: | |||
- shares | |||
- sharedconfigs |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
sharedconfigmaps
- sharedconfigs | |
- sharedconfigmaps |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think it should be sharedconfigmaps
afbed8d
to
d5028c8
Compare
yep fixed thanks @coreydaley |
/lgtm |
/retest-required Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
1 similar comment
/retest-required Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
/hold CI is currently busted https://coreos.slack.com/archives/CEKNRGF25/p1634230288225500 |
/retest |
1 similar comment
/retest |
Well we are back to
since I've vendored the rename into this repo @coreydaley that must mean either that a) we need your openshift/openshift-apiserver PR openshift/openshift-apiserver#244 |
/retest |
Opened openshift/cluster-storage-operator#224 which will hopefully address this. |
/retest |
/retest |
…t, but the mistake happened to land on the choice decided upon (sharedresource vs. storage)
d5028c8
to
e35974c
Compare
/lgtm |
/hold cancel |
the group name was previouisly incorrect, but the mistake happened to land on the choice decided upon (sharedresource vs. storage)
/assign @coreydaley
/assign @adambkaplan