Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bug 1874056: 1.19.0 bump #39

Merged
merged 23 commits into from Sep 1, 2020
Merged

Conversation

damemi
Copy link

@damemi damemi commented Sep 1, 2020

This pulls the upstream 1.19.0 changes into master

ingvagabund and others added 23 commits August 13, 2020 18:38
…pointer

Promote Namespaces field to a pointer
Changing the maintainer for the helm chart to SIG scheduling instead of
an individual person.
…t-update

Update Maintainer Details In Helm Chart
Use WithXXX methods to extend the list of constraints to also
provide a reasonable error message.
Redefine IsEvictable to be customizable for a particular strategy
…torage-pods flags and promote then to policy v1alpha1 fields
…gs-under-descheduler-polic

Deprecate node-selector, max-pods-to-evict-per-node and evict-local-storage-pods flags and promote then to policy v1alpha1 fields
…ization-use-clientset-in-testing

LowNodeUtilization: use clientset in testing, drop all custom reactors
As part of the k8s 1.19 release cycle the Go version is being bumped to
1.15.0. Updating the descheduler to use Go 1.15 prior to the descheduler
v0.19.0 release.

See below issues for reference:
* kubernetes/release#1421
* kubernetes/kubernetes#93484
* Added v0.19 references to README
* Update k8s manifests with v0.19.0 references
@damemi
Copy link
Author

damemi commented Sep 1, 2020

/cc @ingvagabund

The one thing I'm not sure of is the upstream switch to go 1.15, I'm not clear on if our build tooling is on 1.15 yet

@ingvagabund
Copy link
Member

The one thing I'm not sure of is the upstream switch to go 1.15, I'm not clear on if our build tooling is on 1.15 yet

1.14 at most

@ingvagabund
Copy link
Member

/lgtm
/approve

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Sep 1, 2020
@damemi damemi changed the title 1.19.0 bump Bug 1874056: 1.19.0 bump Sep 1, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the bugzilla/severity-urgent Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is urgent for the branch this PR is targeting. label Sep 1, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@damemi: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1874056, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target release (4.6.0) matches configured target release for branch (4.6.0)
  • bug is in the state ASSIGNED, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)

In response to this:

Bug 1874056: 1.19.0 bump

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. label Sep 1, 2020
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 61b58b7 into openshift:master Sep 1, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@damemi: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged:

Bugzilla bug 1874056 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

In response to this:

Bug 1874056: 1.19.0 bump

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bugzilla/severity-urgent Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is urgent for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

6 participants