Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bug 1859196: bump etcd v3.4.9 #52

Merged

Conversation

hexfusion
Copy link

@hexfusion hexfusion commented Jul 15, 2020

This PR bumps etcd to v3.4.9 from v3.4.7 which includes a few important bugfixes:

etcd server

3.4.8 changelog: https://github.com/etcd-io/etcd/blob/master/CHANGELOG-3.4.md#v348-2020-05-18
3.4.9 changelog: https://github.com/etcd-io/etcd/blob/master/CHANGELOG-3.4.md#v349-2020-05-20

CARRY:

polyrabbit and others added 30 commits April 6, 2020 07:06
…f-#11754-upstream-release-3.4

Automated cherry pick of etcd-io#11754 on release-3.4
to improve authentication performance in concurrent scenarios when enable auth and using authentication based password
…of-#11817-origin-release-3.4

Automated cherry pick of etcd-io#11817 on release-3.4
* clientv3: fix grpc-go(v1.27.0) incompatible changes to balancer/resolver.

* vendor: upgrade gRPC Go to v1.24.0

Picking up some performance improvements and bug fixes.

https://github.com/grpc/grpc-go/releases/tag/v1.24.0

Signed-off-by: Gyuho Lee <leegyuho@amazon.com>

* vendor: update gRPC Go to v1.26.0 (etcd-io#11522)

* GO111MODULE=on go mod vendor

* GO111MODULE=on go mod vendor go 1.14

Bump travis 2

Co-authored-by: EDDYCJY <313687982@qq.com>
Co-authored-by: Gyuho Lee <leegyuho@amazon.com>
Co-authored-by: Yuchen Zhou <yczhou@google.com>
etcdserver/*, wal/*: changes to snapshots and wal logic
etcdserver/*: changes to snapshots and wal logic to fix etcd-io#10219
etcdserver/*, wal/*: add Sync method
etcdserver/*, wal/*: find valid snapshots by cross checking snap files and wal snap entries
etcdserver/*, wal/*:Add comments, clean up error messages and tests
etcdserver/*, wal/*: Remove orphaned .snap.db files during Release

Signed-off-by: Gyuho Lee <leegyuho@amazon.com>
Signed-off-by: Ted Yu <yuzhihong@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Gyuho Lee <leegyuho@amazon.com>
ref. etcd-io#11896

Signed-off-by: Gyuho Lee <leegyuho@amazon.com>
Signed-off-by: Gyuho Lee <leegyuho@amazon.com>
Signed-off-by: Gyuho Lee <leegyuho@amazon.com>
Signed-off-by: Gyuho Lee <leegyuho@amazon.com>
Signed-off-by: Gyuho Lee <leegyuho@amazon.com>
…f-#11735-origin-release-3.4

Automated cherry pick of etcd-io#11735 on release-3.4
Signed-off-by: Gyuho Lee <leegyuho@amazon.com>
Signed-off-by: Sam Batschelet <sbatsche@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Sam Batschelet <sbatsche@redhat.com>
Correcting a typo from 2f10964 (version: openshift-v4.0, 2018-11-29).
…uild.

Signed-off-by: Sam Batschelet <sbatsche@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Sam Batschelet <sbatsche@redhat.com>
@hexfusion
Copy link
Author

soak
/test all

@hexfusion
Copy link
Author

/test e2e-aws-upgrade

@hexfusion hexfusion changed the title bump etcd v3.4.9 Bug 1859196: bump etcd v3.4.9 Jul 21, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added bugzilla/severity-high Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is high for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Jul 21, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@hexfusion: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1859196, which is invalid:

  • expected Bugzilla bug 1859196 to depend on a bug in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), but no dependents were found

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

Bug 1859196: bump etcd v3.4.9

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

3 similar comments
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@hexfusion: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1859196, which is invalid:

  • expected Bugzilla bug 1859196 to depend on a bug in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), but no dependents were found

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

Bug 1859196: bump etcd v3.4.9

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@hexfusion: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1859196, which is invalid:

  • expected Bugzilla bug 1859196 to depend on a bug in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), but no dependents were found

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

Bug 1859196: bump etcd v3.4.9

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@hexfusion: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1859196, which is invalid:

  • expected Bugzilla bug 1859196 to depend on a bug in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), but no dependents were found

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

Bug 1859196: bump etcd v3.4.9

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@hexfusion
Copy link
Author

cc @sdodson

@sdodson
Copy link
Member

sdodson commented Jul 21, 2020

@hexfusion Not familiar with this repo, you're already branched for 4.6 or should this go into master and openshift-4.6 gets fast forwarded?

@hexfusion
Copy link
Author

@sdodson master is upstream as we are a fork.

@retroflexer
Copy link

/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jul 21, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: hexfusion, retroflexer

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@hexfusion
Copy link
Author

/bugzilla refresh

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@hexfusion: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1859196, which is invalid:

  • expected Bugzilla bug 1859196 to depend on a bug in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), but no dependents were found

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@sdodson
Copy link
Member

sdodson commented Jul 21, 2020

/bugzilla refresh

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@sdodson: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1859196, which is invalid:

  • expected Bugzilla bug 1859196 to depend on a bug in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), but no dependents were found

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@sdodson sdodson added bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. and removed bugzilla/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Jul 21, 2020
@sdodson
Copy link
Member

sdodson commented Jul 21, 2020

Bot config needs to be looked into, 4.6.0 bugs shouldn't require dependents.

@hexfusion
Copy link
Author

shouldn't need cherry-pick approved either I suspect

@hexfusion hexfusion added the cherry-pick-approved Indicates a cherry-pick PR into a release branch has been approved by the release branch manager. label Jul 21, 2020
@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@sdodson
Copy link
Member

sdodson commented Jul 21, 2020

/retest

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@hexfusion: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged: . Bugzilla bug 1859196 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

In response to this:

Bug 1859196: bump etcd v3.4.9

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. bugzilla/severity-high Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is high for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. cherry-pick-approved Indicates a cherry-pick PR into a release branch has been approved by the release branch manager. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet