Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[release-4.2] Bug 1842577: images: libvirt: add yq to libvirt CI image #3700

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 5, 2020
Merged

[release-4.2] Bug 1842577: images: libvirt: add yq to libvirt CI image #3700

merged 1 commit into from
Jun 5, 2020

Conversation

openshift-cherrypick-robot
Copy link

This is an automated cherry-pick of #3685

/assign Prashanth684

@Prashanth684
images: libvirt: add yq to libvirt CI image
ec2533a 
For s390x/ppc64le we do some amount of yaml manipulation, for example: openshift/release#9362
and we plan to add a volume size which will have increased disk space for certain tests. yq will be especially useful
and easier to use than sed for these manipulations.
@openshift-cherrypick-robot openshift-cherrypick-robot mentioned this pull request Jun 1, 2020
Merged
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: An error was encountered updating cherry-pick bug in Bugzilla: Created cherrypick Bugzilla bug 1842577, but encountered error updating target release for bug 1842577 on the Bugzilla server at https://bugzilla.redhat.com:

response code 502 not 200
Please contact an administrator to resolve this issue, then request a bug refresh with /bugzilla refresh.

In response to this:

[release-4.2] Bug 1841913: images: libvirt: add yq to libvirt CI image

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@Prashanth684
Copy link
Contributor

/bugzilla refresh

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@Prashanth684: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1841913, which is invalid:

  • expected the bug to target the "4.2.z" release, but it targets "4.5.0" instead
  • expected the bug to be in one of the following states: NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST, but it is VERIFIED instead
  • expected Bugzilla bug 1841913 to depend on a bug targeting a release in 4.3.0, 4.3.z and in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), but no dependents were found

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added bugzilla/severity-medium Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is medium for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Jun 1, 2020
@Prashanth684
Copy link
Contributor

/retitle [release-4.2] Bug 1842577: images: libvirt: add yq to libvirt CI image

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot changed the title [release-4.2] Bug 1841913: images: libvirt: add yq to libvirt CI image [release-4.2] Bug 1842577: images: libvirt: add yq to libvirt CI image Jun 1, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1842577, which is invalid:

  • expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1842531 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), but it is NEW instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

[release-4.2] Bug 1842577: images: libvirt: add yq to libvirt CI image

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@sdodson
Copy link
Member

sdodson commented Jun 2, 2020

/approve

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: sdodson

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jun 2, 2020
@Prashanth684
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jun 2, 2020
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1842577, which is invalid:

  • expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1842531 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), but it is NEW instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1842577, which is invalid:

  • expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1842531 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), but it is NEW instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@sdodson sdodson added bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. cherry-pick-approved Indicates a cherry-pick PR into a release branch has been approved by the release branch manager. and removed bugzilla/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Jun 4, 2020
@sdodson
Copy link
Member

sdodson commented Jun 4, 2020

This only affects the test image.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

3 similar comments
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

1 similar comment
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@sdodson
Copy link
Member

sdodson commented Jun 5, 2020

/override ci/prow/e2e-aws
/override ci/prow/e2e-azure
/override ci/prow/e2e-gcp

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@sdodson: Overrode contexts on behalf of sdodson: ci/prow/e2e-aws, ci/prow/e2e-azure, ci/prow/e2e-gcp

In response to this:

/override ci/prow/e2e-aws
/override ci/prow/e2e-azure
/override ci/prow/e2e-gcp

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 4a3693e into openshift:release-4.2 Jun 5, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged: . Bugzilla bug 1842577 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

In response to this:

[release-4.2] Bug 1842577: images: libvirt: add yq to libvirt CI image

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@jcpowermac jcpowermac Awaiting requested review from jcpowermac

@mtnbikenc mtnbikenc Awaiting requested review from mtnbikenc

Assignees

@Prashanth684 Prashanth684

Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. bugzilla/severity-medium Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is medium for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. cherry-pick-approved Indicates a cherry-pick PR into a release branch has been approved by the release branch manager. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
6 participants
@openshift-cherrypick-robot @openshift-ci-robot @Prashanth684 @sdodson @openshift-bot @openshift-merge-robot