-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 103
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Bug 2024640: Rebase v1.20.14 #1101
Bug 2024640: Rebase v1.20.14 #1101
Conversation
hostPath volume plugin creates a directory within /tmp on host machine, to be mounted as volume. inject-pod writes content to the volume, and a client-pod tried the read the contents and verify. when SELinux is enabled on the host, client-pod can not read the content, with permission denied. running the client-pod as privileged, so that it can access the volume content, even when SEinux is enabled on the host.
Signed-off-by: Carlos Panato <ctadeu@gmail.com>
…ck-of-#105734-upstream-release-1.20 Automated cherry pick of kubernetes#105734: Fix race condition in logging when request times out
…leged-storage-client-1.20 Cherry pick of kubernetes#104551: Run storage hostpath e2e test client pod as privileged
…ick-of-#105997-upstream-release-1.20 Automated cherry pick of kubernetes#105997: Fixing how EndpointSlice Mirroring handles Service selector
Update debian, debian-iptables images to pick up CVEs fixes
…g paths Signed-off-by: Monis Khan <mok@vmware.com>
…pick-of-#105755-upstream-release-1.20 Automated cherry pick of kubernetes#105755: Support cgroupv2 in node problem detector test
When GetSELinuxSupport() fails, don't assume a mounted filesystem does not support SELinux at all. Try again instead in the next SetUp retry. This may hurt performance a bit, since kubelet will call NodePublishVolume again, but it's better than providing wrong information to the container runtime that will then skip relabeling of the volume.
Skip parsing of /proc/mounts if SELinux is disabled on the machine.
Previously, an error from GetSELinuxSupport was treated as a filesystem did not support SELinux. Now the error is treated separately.
…f-#94165-upstream-release-1.20 Automated cherry pick of kubernetes#94165: Use separate pathSpec for local and remote to properly handle
…ick-of-#105934-upstream-release-1.20 Automated cherry pick of kubernetes#105934: Don't guess SELinux support on error
Bump kube-openapi against kube-openapi/release-1.20 branch Signed-off-by: Alper Rifat Ulucinar <ulucinar@users.noreply.github.com>
Manual cherry pick of kube-openapi changes for release-1.20
Different CSI drivers have different error messages, making it difficult to check them accurately. We remove the check for the error message and only check the failure type instead, since that is all we need.
…ck-of-#105512-upstream-release-1.20 Automated cherry pick of kubernetes#105512: Add check for subpaths
…-pick-of-#105673-upstream-release-1.20 Automated cherry pick of kubernetes#105673: support more than 100 disk mounts on Windows
/bugzilla refresh Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed. |
@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2024640, which is invalid:
Comment In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
/bugzilla refresh Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed. |
@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2024640, which is invalid:
Comment In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
/bugzilla refresh Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed. |
@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2024640, which is invalid:
Comment In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
/bugzilla refresh Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed. |
@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2024640, which is invalid:
Comment In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
/bugzilla refresh Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed. |
@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2024640, which is invalid:
Comment In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
/bugzilla refresh Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed. |
@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2024640, which is invalid:
Comment In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
/label cherry-pick-approved |
/bugzilla refresh Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed. |
@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2024640, which is invalid:
Comment In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
Since #1102 merged I'm marking this as a valid-bug |
/override ci/prow/verify-commits |
@soltysh: Overrode contexts on behalf of soltysh: ci/prow/verify-commits In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
/retest-required Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
1 similar comment
/retest-required Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
/retest |
/retest-required Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
1 similar comment
/retest-required Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
/test e2e-vsphere |
@josefkarasek: The following test failed, say
Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
@josefkarasek: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged: Bugzilla bug 2024640 has been moved to the MODIFIED state. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
CHANGELOG: https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/blob/master/CHANGELOG/CHANGELOG-1.20.md#v12014